• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续技能中的行动计划:与音乐表演的关系

Action planning in sequential skills: relations to music performance.

作者信息

Keller Peter E, Koch Iring

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Psychology, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Feb;61(2):275-91. doi: 10.1080/17470210601160864.

DOI:10.1080/17470210601160864
PMID:17853237
Abstract

The hypothesis that planning music-like sequential actions involves anticipating their auditory effects was investigated in a series of experiments. Participants with varying levels of musical experience responded to each of four colour-patch stimuli by producing a unique sequence of three taps on three vertically aligned keys. Each tap triggered a tone in most experimental conditions. Response--effect (key-to-tone) mapping was either compatible--taps on the top, middle, and bottom keys triggered high, medium, and low pitched tones, respectively--or incompatible--key-to-tone mapping was scrambled, reversed, or neutral (taps on different keys triggered the same tone). The results suggest that action planning was faster with compatible than with incompatible mappings (and faster than with no tones). Furthermore, the size of this compatibility effect grew with increasing musical experience, which suggests that improvements in auditory imagery ability that typically accompany musical training may augment the role of anticipatory auditory-effect representations during planning.

摘要

在一系列实验中,对规划类似音乐的连续动作涉及预期其听觉效果这一假设进行了研究。具有不同音乐经验水平的参与者通过在三个垂直对齐的按键上产生独特的三次敲击序列,对四种颜色块刺激中的每一种做出反应。在大多数实验条件下,每次敲击都会触发一个音调。反应-效果(按键-音调)映射要么是兼容的——顶部、中间和底部按键的敲击分别触发高音、中音和低音——要么是不兼容的——按键-音调映射被打乱、颠倒或中性(不同按键的敲击触发相同音调)。结果表明,兼容映射的动作规划比不兼容映射的动作规划更快(且比无音调时更快)。此外,这种兼容性效应的大小随着音乐经验的增加而增大,这表明通常伴随音乐训练的听觉意象能力的提高可能会增强预期听觉效果表征在规划过程中的作用。

相似文献

1
Action planning in sequential skills: relations to music performance.连续技能中的行动计划:与音乐表演的关系
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Feb;61(2):275-91. doi: 10.1080/17470210601160864.
2
Auditory imagery shapes movement timing and kinematics: evidence from a musical task.听觉意象塑造运动的时间和运动学:来自音乐任务的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Apr;36(2):508-13. doi: 10.1037/a0017604.
3
The planning and execution of short auditory sequences.短听觉序列的规划与执行。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Aug;13(4):711-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03193985.
4
Neural basis of music imagery and the effect of musical expertise.音乐意象的神经基础及音乐专业技能的影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Dec;28(11):2352-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06515.x.
5
Music playing and memory trace: evidence from event-related potentials.音乐播放与记忆痕迹:事件相关电位的证据。
Neurosci Res. 2010 Aug;67(4):334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
6
Ideomotor effects of pitch on continuation tapping.音高对连续敲击的观念运动效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Feb;64(2):381-93. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.495408. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
7
Auditory pitch imagery and its relationship to musical synchronization.听觉音高意象及其与音乐同步的关系。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:282-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04785.x.
8
Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.音乐训练可改善人工耳蜗植入的语前聋儿童的音高感知能力。
Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):e793-800. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3620. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
9
Short-term plasticity in the auditory system: differential neural responses to perception and imagery of speech and music.听觉系统中的短期可塑性:对语音和音乐感知与想象的不同神经反应。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(3-4):411-31.
10
Perception of musical pitch and lexical tones by Mandarin-speaking musicians.普通话使用者对音乐音高和语调的感知
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jan;127(1):481-90. doi: 10.1121/1.3266683.

引用本文的文献

1
Pleasantness makes a good time: musical consonance shapes interpersonal synchronization in dyadic joint action.愉悦感成就美好时光:音乐和谐在二元联合行动中塑造人际同步。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Oct 22;18:1472632. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1472632. eCollection 2024.
2
Repetition costs in sequence chunking.序列分块中的重复代价。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):802-818. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02338-7. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
3
Why motor imagery is not really motoric: towards a re-conceptualization in terms of effect-based action control.
为什么动作想象不是真正的动作:基于效应的动作控制的重新概念化。
Psychol Res. 2024 Sep;88(6):1790-1804. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01773-w. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
4
Individual differences in mental imagery in different modalities and levels of intentionality.不同模式和意向水平的心理意象的个体差异。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):29-44. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01209-7. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
5
A metastable attractor model of self-other integration (MEAMSO) in rhythmic synchronization.在节奏同步中自我-他人整合的亚稳态吸引子模型 (MEAMSO)。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Oct 11;376(1835):20200332. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0332. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
The role of action effects in motor sequence planning and execution: exploring the influence of temporal and spatial effect anticipation.动作效果在运动序列规划和执行中的作用:探索时间和空间效果预期的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1078-1096. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01525-2. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
7
Evidence for a multicomponent hierarchical representation of dual tasks.多成分层次表示双任务的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Feb;49(2):350-363. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01097-3. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Response orientation modulates pitch-space relationships: the ROMPR effect.反应取向调节音高空间关系:ROMPR 效应。
Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2197-2212. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01388-z. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Action-Perception Coupling and Near Transfer: Listening to Melodies after Piano Practice Triggers Sequence-Specific Representations in the Auditory-Motor Network.动作-感知耦合和近迁移:钢琴练习后聆听旋律会在听觉-运动网络中引发序列特异性的表征。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Sep 3;30(10):5193-5203. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa018.
10
Can 'Hebb' Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory Distraction.“赫布理论”会被干扰吗?测试序列学习对听觉干扰的敏感性。
J Cogn. 2018 Jan 10;2(1):4. doi: 10.5334/joc.8.