Sackett Paul R, Lievens Filip
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:419-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093716.
We review developments in personnel selection since the previous review by Hough & Oswald (2000) in the Annual Review of Psychology. We organize the review around a taxonomic structure of possible bases for improved selection, which includes (a) better understanding of the criterion domain and criterion measurement, (b) improved measurement of existing predictor methods or constructs, (c) identification and measurement of new predictor methods or constructs, (d) improved identification of features that moderate or mediate predictor-criterion relationships, (e) clearer understanding of the relationship between predictors or between predictors and criteria (e.g., via meta-analytic synthesis), (f) identification and prediction of new outcome variables, (g) improved ability to determine how well we predict the outcomes of interest, (h) improved understanding of subgroup differences, fairness, bias, and the legal defensibility, (i) improved administrative ease with which selection systems can be used, (j) improved insight into applicant reactions, and (k) improved decision-maker acceptance of selection systems.
我们回顾了自霍夫和奥斯瓦尔德(2000年)在《心理学年度评论》上发表的上一篇综述以来人员选拔方面的进展。我们围绕改进选拔的可能依据的分类结构来组织本次综述,其中包括:(a)对标准领域和标准测量有更深入的理解;(b)改进对现有预测方法或构念的测量;(c)识别和测量新的预测方法或构念;(d)改进对调节或中介预测指标与标准关系的特征的识别;(e)更清晰地理解预测指标之间或预测指标与标准之间的关系(例如,通过元分析综合);(f)识别和预测新的结果变量;(g)提高确定我们对感兴趣结果的预测效果的能力;(h)更好地理解亚组差异、公平性、偏差和法律可辩护性;(i)提高选拔系统使用的管理便利性;(j)更深入了解申请人的反应;以及(k)提高决策者对选拔系统的接受度。