• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于事件和动态定时器的分形模型。

Fractal models for event-based and dynamical timers.

作者信息

Delignières Didier, Torre Kjerstin, Lemoine Loïc

机构信息

EA 2991, Motor Efficiency and Deficiency, University Montpellier I, France.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):382-97. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.007
PMID:17854754
Abstract

Some recent papers proposed to distinguish between event-based and emergent timing. Event-based timing is conceived as prescribed by events produced by a central clock, and seems to be used in discrete tasks (e.g., finger tapping). Emergent or dynamical timing refers to the exploitation of the dynamical properties of effectors, and is typically used in continuous tasks (e.g., circle drawing). The analysis of period series suggested that both timing control processes possess fractal properties, characterized by self-similarity and long-range dependence. The aim of this article is to present two models that produce period series presenting the statistical properties previously evidenced in discrete and continuous rhythmic tasks. The first one is an adaptation of the classical activation/threshold models, including a plateau-like evolution of the threshold over time. The second one is a hybrid limit-cycle model, including a time-dependent linear stiffness parameter. Both models reproduced satisfactorily the spectral signatures of event-based and dynamical timing processes, respectively. The models also produced auto-correlation functions similar to those experimentally observed. Using ARFIMA modeling we show that these simulated series possess fractal properties. We suggest in conclusion some possible extensions of this modeling approach, to account for the effects of metronomic pacing, or to analyze bimanual coordination.

摘要

最近的一些论文提议区分基于事件的计时和涌现计时。基于事件的计时被认为是由中央时钟产生的事件所规定的,似乎用于离散任务(例如手指敲击)。涌现或动态计时是指对效应器动态特性的利用,通常用于连续任务(例如画圆)。对周期序列的分析表明,这两种计时控制过程都具有分形特性,其特征是自相似性和长程相关性。本文的目的是提出两个模型,它们生成的周期序列呈现出先前在离散和连续节奏任务中所证明的统计特性。第一个模型是经典激活/阈值模型的一种改编,包括阈值随时间呈类似平台状的演变。第二个模型是一个混合极限环模型,包括一个随时间变化的线性刚度参数。这两个模型分别令人满意地再现了基于事件的计时过程和动态计时过程的频谱特征。这些模型还产生了与实验观察到的自相关函数相似的自相关函数。使用自回归分数整合移动平均(ARFIMA)建模,我们表明这些模拟序列具有分形特性。我们在结论中提出了这种建模方法的一些可能扩展,以解释节拍器 pacing 的影响,或分析双手协调。

相似文献

1
Fractal models for event-based and dynamical timers.基于事件和动态定时器的分形模型。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):382-97. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
2
Distinct ways of timing movements in bimanual coordination tasks: contribution of serial correlation analysis and implications for modeling.双手协调任务中运动计时的不同方式:序列相关性分析的贡献及对建模的启示
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Oct;129(2):284-96. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
3
The distinction between tapping and circle drawing with and without tactile feedback: an examination of the sources of timing variance.有触觉反馈和无触觉反馈情况下敲击与画圈的区别:对时间变化来源的考察
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1086-100. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.640404. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
4
Unraveling the finding of 1/f beta noise in self-paced and synchronized tapping: a unifying mechanistic model.解析自定节奏和同步敲击时1/fβ噪声的发现:一个统一的机制模型。
Biol Cybern. 2008 Aug;99(2):159-70. doi: 10.1007/s00422-008-0247-8. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
5
Coordination dynamics and attentional costs of continuous and discontinuous bimanual circle drawing movements.连续和不连续双手画圈动作的协调动力学与注意力成本
Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Oct;27(5):823-37. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.11.003. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
6
Distinct timing mechanisms are implicated in distinct circle drawing tasks.不同的画圆任务涉及不同的时间机制。
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Mar 12;472(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.047. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
7
Aging effects on event and emergent timing in bimanual coordination.双手协调中事件和突发时间的老化效应。
Hum Mov Sci. 2010 Oct;29(5):820-30. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.10.003.
8
Timing processes are correlated when tasks share a salient event.当任务共享一个显著事件时,时间进程是相关的。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1565-75. doi: 10.1037/a0020380.
9
The influence of dominant versus non-dominant hand on event and emergent motor timing.优势手与非优势手对事件及突发运动时机的影响。
Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Feb;27(1):29-52. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.08.004. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
10
On the timing basis of bimanual coordination in discrete and continuous tasks.基于离散和连续任务中双手协调的时间基础。
Brain Cogn. 2002 Feb;48(1):133-48. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1309.

引用本文的文献

1
Principles Entailed by Complexity, Crucial Events, and Multifractal Dimensionality.复杂性、关键事件和多重分形维数所蕴含的原理。
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;27(3):241. doi: 10.3390/e27030241.
2
Human Information Processing of the Speed of Various Movements Estimated Based on Trajectory Change.基于轨迹变化对各种运动速度的人类信息处理
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Apr 20;25(4):695. doi: 10.3390/e25040695.
3
Origins of 1/f noise in human music performance from short-range autocorrelations related to rhythmic structures.人类音乐表演中 1/f 噪声的起源与节奏结构相关的短程自相关。
PLoS One. 2019 May 6;14(5):e0216088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216088. eCollection 2019.
4
Do intentionality constraints shape the relationship between motor variability and performance?意图约束是否影响运动变异性与表现之间的关系?
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0214237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214237. eCollection 2019.
5
Exploring complexity matching and asynchrony dynamics in synchronized and syncopated task performances.探索同步和切分任务表现中的复杂性匹配与异步动态。
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Dec;62:81-104. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
6
Paired Synchronous Rhythmic Finger Tapping without an External Timing Cue Shows Greater Speed Increases Relative to Those for Solo Tapping.在没有外部定时提示的情况下进行成对同步有节奏的手指敲击,其速度增加相对大于单独敲击。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 9;7:43987. doi: 10.1038/srep43987.
7
Multifractal signatures of complexity matching.复杂度匹配的多重分形特征
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):2773-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4679-4. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Experimental control of scaling behavior: what is not fractal?标度行为的实验控制:什么不是分形的?
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Oct;233(10):2813-21. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4351-4. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
9
Long-range correlation properties in timing of skilled piano performance: the influence of auditory feedback and deep brain stimulation.熟练钢琴演奏时机中的长程相关性特性:听觉反馈与深部脑刺激的影响
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 25;5:1030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01030. eCollection 2014.
10
Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012).感觉运动同步:对最近研究(2006-2012)的综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):403-52. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2.