Valian V
Department of Psychology, Hunter College, New York, NY 10021.
Cognition. 1991 Aug;40(1-2):21-81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90046-7.
Why do young children leave out sentential subjects? Two competence-deficit hypotheses and a performance-limitation account are evaluated in the present set of studies. American children appear to understand that English requires subjects before mean length of utterance (MLU) 2.0. On balance, performance factors account for the data best. Natural conversations between 21 American children (ranging in age from 1;10 to 2;8 and in MLU from 1.53 to 4.38) and their mothers were taped, transcribed, and analyzed to determine when American children understand that English requires subjects. We measured the frequency of subjects (Study 1); types of pronominal subjects, including expletives (Study 2); frequency of modals and semi-auxiliaries (Study 3); frequency of infinitival to, past tense, third person singular, and subordinate clauses (Study 4); length of verb phrase, frequency of different types of verbs, and frequency of direct objects (Study 5). For Studies 1 and 3 we also used, for comparative purposes, transcripts of 5 Italian children, taped monthly for a year. Even our lowest-MLU American group (5 children between 1.5 and 1.99) used subjects and pronominal subjects more than twice as often as the Italian children, and correctly case-marked their subjects. The American children also produced examples of all the sentence elements measured.
为什么幼儿会省略句子主语?在本系列研究中对两种能力缺陷假设和一种表现限制解释进行了评估。美国儿童似乎在话语平均长度(MLU)达到2.0之前就理解英语需要主语。总体而言,表现因素最能解释这些数据。录制、转录并分析了21名美国儿童(年龄从1岁10个月至2岁8个月,MLU从1.53至4.38)与其母亲之间的自然对话,以确定美国儿童何时理解英语需要主语。我们测量了主语的出现频率(研究1);代词主语的类型,包括虚主语(研究2);情态动词和半助动词的出现频率(研究3);不定式to、过去式、第三人称单数和从句的出现频率(研究4);动词短语的长度、不同类型动词的出现频率以及直接宾语的出现频率(研究5)。为了进行比较,对于研究1和3,我们还使用了5名意大利儿童的转录文本,这些文本是他们在一年中每月录制一次的。即使是我们MLU最低的美国儿童组(5名年龄在1.5至1.99岁之间的儿童)使用主语和代词主语的频率也比意大利儿童高出两倍多,并且能正确地标出主语的格。美国儿童还给出了所有测量的句子成分的例子。