• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用局部淋巴结试验对丙烯酸酯类(丙烯酸甲酯、丙烯酸乙酯、丙烯酸丁酯和丙烯酸2-乙基己酯)的皮肤致敏强度进行比较分析。

Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.

作者信息

Dearman Rebecca J, Betts Catherine J, Farr Craig, McLaughlin James, Berdasco Nancy, Wiench Karin, Kimber Ian

机构信息

Immunology, Syngenta Central Toxicology Laboratory, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK1 4TJ, UK.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct;57(4):242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01215.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01215.x
PMID:17868217
Abstract

There are currently available no systematic experimental data on the skin sensitizing properties of acrylates that are of relevance in occupational settings. Limited information from previous guinea-pig tests or from the local lymph node assay (LLNA) is available; however, these data are incomplete and somewhat contradictory. For those reasons, we have examined in the LLNA 4 acrylates: butyl acrylate (BA), ethyl acrylate (EA), methyl acrylate (MA), and ethylhexyl acrylate (EHA). The LLNA data indicated that all 4 compounds have some potential to cause skin sensitization. In addition, the relative potencies of these acrylates were measured by derivation from LLNA dose-response analyses of EC3 values (the effective concentration of chemical required to induce a threefold increase in proliferation of draining lymph node cells compared with control values). On the basis of 1 scheme for the categorization of skin sensitization potency, BA, EA, and MA were each classified as weak sensitizers. Using the same scheme, EHA was considered a moderate sensitizer. However, it must be emphasized that the EC3 value for this chemical of 9.7% is on the borderline between moderate (<10%) and weak (>10%) categories. Thus, the judicious view is that all 4 chemicals possess relatively weak skin sensitizing potential.

摘要

目前尚无关于职业环境中相关丙烯酸酯类皮肤致敏特性的系统实验数据。可获取的先前豚鼠试验或局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)的信息有限;然而,这些数据并不完整且存在一定矛盾。基于这些原因,我们通过LLNA检测了4种丙烯酸酯:丙烯酸丁酯(BA)、丙烯酸乙酯(EA)、丙烯酸甲酯(MA)和丙烯酸2-乙基己酯(EHA)。LLNA数据表明,所有这4种化合物均有一定的引起皮肤致敏的可能性。此外,通过对LLNA剂量-反应分析得出的EC3值(与对照值相比,诱导引流淋巴结细胞增殖增加三倍所需的化学物质有效浓度)来测定这些丙烯酸酯的相对效力。根据一种皮肤致敏效力分类方案,BA、EA和MA均被归类为弱致敏剂。使用相同方案,EHA被认为是中度致敏剂。然而,必须强调的是,该化学物质9.7%的EC3值处于中度(<10%)和弱度(>10%)类别之间的边界线上。因此,明智的观点是所有这4种化学物质均具有相对较弱的皮肤致敏潜力。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.使用局部淋巴结试验对丙烯酸酯类(丙烯酸甲酯、丙烯酸乙酯、丙烯酸丁酯和丙烯酸2-乙基己酯)的皮肤致敏强度进行比较分析。
Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct;57(4):242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01215.x.
2
Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.使用局部淋巴结试验的非放射性同位素改良法评估丁香酚及其二聚体的皮肤致敏能力。
J Appl Toxicol. 2004 Jan-Feb;24(1):77-81. doi: 10.1002/jat.951.
3
The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.载体对局部淋巴结试验中皮肤致敏化学物质相对效力的影响。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2008;27(2):67-75. doi: 10.1080/15569520801904655.
4
Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.通过对局部淋巴结试验进行非放射性同位素修饰,根据皮肤致敏潜力对化学品进行分类的新方法。
J Appl Toxicol. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):129-34. doi: 10.1002/jat.1045.
5
Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.接触性变应原效力:人体与局部淋巴结试验数据的相关性
Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Sep;12(3):156-61. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2001.23926.
6
Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.甲基丙烯酸甲酯在局部淋巴结试验中的皮肤致敏潜力:与豚鼠数据及人体经验的比较。
Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Sep;55(3):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00898.x.
7
Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.用于检测化学物质致敏能力的局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)。
Methods. 2007 Jan;41(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.006.
8
Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.使用局部淋巴结试验评估相对皮肤致敏潜能:甲醛与戊二醛的比较
Am J Contact Dermat. 1998 Mar;9(1):29-33.
9
The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.局部淋巴结试验及相对效价评估:验证状况
Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Aug;57(2):70-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01141.x.
10
Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.局部淋巴结试验与人体皮肤致敏试验之间的定量关系。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;39(3):245-55. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.02.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Applicability Domain of the Sens-Is In Vitro Assay for Testing the Skin Sensitization Potential of Rheology-Modifying Polymers.用于测试流变改性聚合物皮肤致敏潜力的Sens-Is体外试验的适用范围
Polymers (Basel). 2025 May 20;17(10):1408. doi: 10.3390/polym17101408.
2
Adhesives Used for Diabetes Medical Devices: A Neglected Risk With Serious Consequences?用于糖尿病医疗设备的粘合剂:一种被忽视的风险,会带来严重后果?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Nov 1;10(6):1211-1215. doi: 10.1177/1932296816662949. Print 2016 Nov.
3
Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.
预测化学诱导的皮肤反应。第一部分:皮肤致敏的定量构效关系模型及其在识别潜在有害化合物中的应用。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015 Apr 15;284(2):262-72. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
4
Methyl methacrylate and respiratory sensitization: a critical review.甲基丙烯酸甲酯与呼吸道致敏作用:批判性综述。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2011 Mar;41(3):230-68. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2010.532768.
5
Rapid and simple kinetics screening assay for electrophilic dermal sensitizers using nitrobenzenethiol.使用硝基苯硫醇进行亲电性皮肤敏化剂的快速简单动力学筛选测定法。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2010 May 17;23(5):918-25. doi: 10.1021/tx100003w.