Dearman Rebecca J, Betts Catherine J, Farr Craig, McLaughlin James, Berdasco Nancy, Wiench Karin, Kimber Ian
Immunology, Syngenta Central Toxicology Laboratory, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK1 4TJ, UK.
Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct;57(4):242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01215.x.
There are currently available no systematic experimental data on the skin sensitizing properties of acrylates that are of relevance in occupational settings. Limited information from previous guinea-pig tests or from the local lymph node assay (LLNA) is available; however, these data are incomplete and somewhat contradictory. For those reasons, we have examined in the LLNA 4 acrylates: butyl acrylate (BA), ethyl acrylate (EA), methyl acrylate (MA), and ethylhexyl acrylate (EHA). The LLNA data indicated that all 4 compounds have some potential to cause skin sensitization. In addition, the relative potencies of these acrylates were measured by derivation from LLNA dose-response analyses of EC3 values (the effective concentration of chemical required to induce a threefold increase in proliferation of draining lymph node cells compared with control values). On the basis of 1 scheme for the categorization of skin sensitization potency, BA, EA, and MA were each classified as weak sensitizers. Using the same scheme, EHA was considered a moderate sensitizer. However, it must be emphasized that the EC3 value for this chemical of 9.7% is on the borderline between moderate (<10%) and weak (>10%) categories. Thus, the judicious view is that all 4 chemicals possess relatively weak skin sensitizing potential.
目前尚无关于职业环境中相关丙烯酸酯类皮肤致敏特性的系统实验数据。可获取的先前豚鼠试验或局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)的信息有限;然而,这些数据并不完整且存在一定矛盾。基于这些原因,我们通过LLNA检测了4种丙烯酸酯:丙烯酸丁酯(BA)、丙烯酸乙酯(EA)、丙烯酸甲酯(MA)和丙烯酸2-乙基己酯(EHA)。LLNA数据表明,所有这4种化合物均有一定的引起皮肤致敏的可能性。此外,通过对LLNA剂量-反应分析得出的EC3值(与对照值相比,诱导引流淋巴结细胞增殖增加三倍所需的化学物质有效浓度)来测定这些丙烯酸酯的相对效力。根据一种皮肤致敏效力分类方案,BA、EA和MA均被归类为弱致敏剂。使用相同方案,EHA被认为是中度致敏剂。然而,必须强调的是,该化学物质9.7%的EC3值处于中度(<10%)和弱度(>10%)类别之间的边界线上。因此,明智的观点是所有这4种化学物质均具有相对较弱的皮肤致敏潜力。