Suppr超能文献

多排冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术对全因死亡率预测的预后价值。

Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality.

作者信息

Min James K, Shaw Leslee J, Devereux Richard B, Okin Peter M, Weinsaft Jonathan W, Russo Donald J, Lippolis Nicholas J, Berman Daniel S, Callister Tracy Q

机构信息

Greenberg Division of Cardiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 18;50(12):1161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.067. Epub 2007 Sep 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the association of all-cause death with the coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA)-defined extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of identifying CAD by CCTA remains undefined.

METHODS

We examined a single-center consecutive cohort of 1,127 patients > or =45 years old with chest symptoms. Stenosis by CCTA was scored as minimal (<30%), mild (30% to 49%), moderate (50% to 69%), or severe (> or =70%) for each coronary artery. Plaque was assessed in 3 ways: 1) moderate or obstructive plaque; 2) CCTA score modified from Duke coronary artery score; and 3) simple clinical scores grading plaque extent and distribution. A 15.3 +/- 3.9-month follow-up of all-cause death was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for pretest CAD likelihood and risk factors. Deaths were verified by the Social Security Death Index.

RESULTS

The CCTA predictors of death included proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis and number of vessels with > or =50% and > or =70% stenosis (all p < 0.0001). A modified Duke CAD index, an angiographic score integrating proximal CAD, plaque extent, and left main (LM) disease, improved risk stratification (p < 0.0001). Patients with <50% stenosis had the highest survival at 99.7%. Survival worsened with higher-risk Duke scores, ranging from 96% survival for 1 stenosis > or =70% or 2 stenoses > or =50% (p = 0.013) to 85% survival for > or =50% LM artery stenosis (p < 0.0001). Clinical scores measuring plaque burden and distribution predicted 5% to 6% higher absolute death rate (6.6% vs. 1.6% and 8.4% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chest pain, CCTA identifies increased risk for all-cause death. Importantly, a negative CCTA portends an extremely low risk for death.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨全因死亡与冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)定义的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)范围及严重程度之间的关联。

背景

通过CCTA识别CAD的预后价值尚不明确。

方法

我们对一个单中心连续队列中的1127例年龄≥45岁且有胸痛症状的患者进行了研究。CCTA对每条冠状动脉的狭窄程度分为轻度(<30%)、中度(30%至49%)、重度(50%至69%)或极重度(≥70%)。斑块通过三种方式进行评估:1)中度或阻塞性斑块;2)根据杜克冠状动脉评分修改的CCTA评分;3)简单的临床评分,用于对斑块范围和分布进行分级。使用Cox比例风险模型对全因死亡进行了15.3±3.9个月的随访评估,该模型针对检测前CAD可能性和风险因素进行了调整。死亡情况通过社会保障死亡指数进行核实。

结果

死亡的CCTA预测因素包括左前降支近端狭窄以及狭窄程度≥50%和≥70% 的血管数量(所有p<0.0001)。改良的杜克CAD指数,一种整合了近端CAD、斑块范围和左主干(LM)疾病的血管造影评分,改善了风险分层(p<0.0001)。狭窄程度<50%的患者生存率最高,为99.7%。随着杜克评分风险的增加,生存率下降,从1处狭窄≥70%或2处狭窄≥50%时的96%生存率(p = 0.013)到LM动脉狭窄≥50%时的85%生存率(p<0.0001)。测量斑块负荷和分布情况的临床评分预测的绝对死亡率高出5%至6%(分别为6.6%对1.6%以及8.4%对2.5%;两者p均 = 0.05)。

结论

在胸痛患者中,CCTA可识别出全因死亡风险增加。重要的是,CCTA结果为阴性预示着死亡风险极低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验