Carofino Bradley C, Santangelo Stephen A, Kabadi Mitesh, Mazzocca Augustus D, Browner Bruce D
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2007 Sep;23(9):964-70. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.008.
Tension band constructs are commonly used for olecranon fracture fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine if a tension band constructed of FiberWire (Arthrex, Naples, FL), a high-strength polyester and polyethylene suture, will provide fixation that is equivalent to an 18-gauge metal wire tension band.
The following 4 fixation methods were biomechanically tested in cadaveric elbows with a simulated transverse olecranon fracture: (1) Kirschner wires (K-wires) with an 18-gauge metal wire tension band, (2) K-wires with a FiberWire tension band, (3) intramedullary screw with an 18-gauge metal wire tension band, and (4) intramedullary screw with a FiberWire tension band. Each elbow underwent all 4 repair methods. The K-wire repairs were performed first followed by the intramedullary screw repairs. The order of the tension band (FiberWire or metal wire) was randomly assigned. Specimens were tested under cyclic loading conditions that simulated stresses generated by (1) active range of motion and (2) pushing up from a chair. Fracture displacement was recorded by using transducers placed at the articular surface of the fracture and on the posterior surface of the olecranon.
There were no significant differences in fracture displacement associated with the use of a high-strength suture or metal wire tension band under conditions simulating active range of motion or a more vigorous physiologic stress. Also, there were no significant differences associated with the use of an intramedullary screw versus K-wire fixation under either condition.
The biomechanical characteristics of high-strength suture tension bands are equivalent to 18-gauge metal wire tension bands when used with either an intramedullary screw or K-wires. The fatigue patterns of high-strength suture tension bands and metal wire tension bands are similar. There is not a significant difference between the biomechanical strength of intramedullary screw fixation constructs and K-wire constructs.
FiberWire tension bands may be used in place of metal wire tension bands without sacrificing fixation strength.
张力带结构常用于鹰嘴骨折固定。本研究的目的是确定由高强度聚酯和聚乙烯缝线FiberWire(Arthrex,那不勒斯,佛罗里达州)构成的张力带是否能提供与18号金属丝张力带等效的固定效果。
在具有模拟横行鹰嘴骨折的尸体肘部上对以下4种固定方法进行生物力学测试:(1)克氏针(K针)加18号金属丝张力带,(2)K针加FiberWire张力带,(3)髓内螺钉加18号金属丝张力带,以及(4)髓内螺钉加FiberWire张力带。每个肘部均接受所有4种修复方法。先进行K针修复,然后进行髓内螺钉修复。张力带(FiberWire或金属丝)的顺序随机分配。在模拟(1)主动活动范围和(2)从椅子上起身推起所产生应力的循环加载条件下对标本进行测试。通过放置在骨折关节面和鹰嘴后表面的传感器记录骨折移位情况。
在模拟主动活动范围或更剧烈生理应力的条件下,使用高强度缝线或金属丝张力带时,骨折移位无显著差异。同样,在这两种情况下,使用髓内螺钉与K针固定也无显著差异。
高强度缝线张力带与髓内螺钉或K针一起使用时,其生物力学特性与18号金属丝张力带等效。高强度缝线张力带和金属丝张力带的疲劳模式相似。髓内螺钉固定结构和K针结构的生物力学强度无显著差异。
FiberWire张力带可替代金属丝张力带而不牺牲固定强度。