Lalliss S J, Branstetter J G
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Feb;92(2):315-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22596.
Using an osteotomy of the olecranon as a model of a transverse fracture in 22 cadaver elbows we determined the ability of three different types of suture and stainless steel wire to maintain reduction when using a tension-band technique to stabilise the bone. Physiological cyclical loading simulating passive elbow movement (15 N) and using the arms to push up from a chair (450 N) were applied using an Instron materials testing machine whilst monitoring the osteotomy site with a video extensometer. Each osteotomy was repaired by one of four materials, namely, Stainless Steel Wire (7), No 2 Ethibond (3), No 5 Ethibond (5), or No 2 FiberWire (7). There were no failures (movement of > 2 mm) with stainless steel wire or FiberWire and no significant difference in the movements measured across the site of the osteotomy (p = 0.99). The No. 2 Ethibond failed at 450 N and two of the five of No. 5 Ethibond sutures had a separation of > 2 mm at 450 N. FiberWire as the tension band in this model held the reduction as effectively as stainless steel wire and may reduce the incidence of discomfort from the hardware. On the basis of our findings we suggest that a clinical trial should be undertaken.
在22个尸体肘部上,我们采用尺骨鹰嘴截骨术作为横行骨折模型,确定了在使用张力带技术稳定骨骼时,三种不同类型的缝线和不锈钢丝维持骨折复位的能力。使用Instron材料试验机施加模拟被动肘部运动的生理循环负荷(15 N)以及用手臂从椅子上撑起的负荷(450 N),同时用视频引伸计监测截骨部位。每个截骨部位用四种材料之一进行修复,即不锈钢丝(7例)、2号Ethibond缝线(3例)、5号Ethibond缝线(5例)或2号FiberWire缝线(7例)。不锈钢丝或FiberWire均未出现失败情况(移位>2 mm),截骨部位测量的移位无显著差异(p = 0.99)。2号Ethibond缝线在450 N时失败,5号Ethibond缝线中的5例中有2例在450 N时出现>2 mm的分离。在该模型中,FiberWire作为张力带与不锈钢丝一样有效地维持了骨折复位,并且可能降低硬件引起不适的发生率。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议进行一项临床试验。