Csibra Gergely
School of Psychology, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom.
Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):705-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
Human infants' tendency to attribute goals to observed actions may help us to understand where people's obsession with goals originates from. While one-year-old infants liberally interpret the behaviour of many kinds of agents as goal-directed, a recent report [Kamewari, K., Kato, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hiraki, K. (2005). Six-and-a-half-month-old children positively attribute goals to human action and to humanoid-robot motion. Cognitive Development, 20, 303-320] suggested that younger infants restrict goal attribution to humans and human-like creatures. The present experiment tested whether 6.5-month-old infants would be willing to attribute a goal to a moving inanimate box if it slightly varied its goal approach within the range of the available efficient actions. The results were positive, demonstrating that featural identification of agents is not a necessary precondition of goal attribution in young infants and that the single most important behavioural cue for identifying a goal-directed agent is variability of behaviour. This result supports the view that the bias to give teleological interpretation to actions is not entirely derived from infants' experience.
人类婴儿将目标归因于观察到的行为的倾向,可能有助于我们理解人们对目标的痴迷源自何处。虽然一岁的婴儿会宽泛地将多种主体的行为解释为有目标导向的,但最近的一份报告[龟泽佳织、加藤真、神田智、石黑浩和平木启(2005年)。六个半月大的儿童积极地将目标归因于人类行为和类人机器人的运动。《认知发展》,第20卷,第303 - 320页]表明,更小的婴儿将目标归因限制于人类和类人生物。本实验测试了6.5个月大的婴儿是否愿意将目标归因于一个移动的无生命盒子,如果它在可用的有效行动范围内稍微改变其目标接近方式。结果是肯定的,这表明对主体的特征识别并非婴儿进行目标归因的必要前提,并且识别有目标导向主体的唯一最重要行为线索是行为的变异性。这一结果支持了这样一种观点,即对行为进行目的论解释的倾向并非完全源自婴儿的经验。