Suppr超能文献

类别学习与记忆系统辩论。

Category learning and the memory systems debate.

作者信息

Poldrack Russell A, Foerde Karin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(2):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Aug 10.

Abstract

A substantial and growing body of evidence from cognitive neuroscience supports the concept of multiple memory systems (MMS). However, the existence of multiple systems has been questioned by theorists who instead propose that dissociations can be accounted for within a single memory system. We present convergent evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies of category learning in favor of the existence of MMS for category learning and declarative knowledge. Whereas single-system theorists have argued that their approach is more parsimonious because it only postulates a single form of memory representation, we show that the MMS approach is superior in its ability to account for a broad range of data from psychology and neuroscience.

摘要

来自认知神经科学的大量且不断增加的证据支持多重记忆系统(MMS)的概念。然而,多重系统的存在受到了一些理论家的质疑,他们反而提出分离现象可以在单一记忆系统中得到解释。我们展示了来自类别学习的神经成像和神经心理学研究的趋同证据,以支持类别学习和陈述性知识存在多重记忆系统。虽然单系统理论家认为他们的方法更简洁,因为它只假定了一种记忆表征形式,但我们表明多重记忆系统方法在解释来自心理学和神经科学的广泛数据方面具有更强的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验