• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高烧伤患者死亡率的预测能力。

Improving the ability to predict mortality among burn patients.

作者信息

McGwin Gerald, George Richard L, Cross James M, Rue Loring W

机构信息

Section of Trauma, Burns, and Surgical Critical Care, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

出版信息

Burns. 2008 May;34(3):320-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2007.06.003
PMID:17869427
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early efforts to predict death following severe burns focused on age and burn size; more recent work incorporated inhalation injury and pneumonia. Gender, co-morbid illness, and co-existent trauma have been implicated in burn mortality but have rarely been incorporated into predictive models.

METHODS

The National Burn Repository (NBR) and the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) provided data on 68,661 (54,219 and 14,442, respectively) burn patients that was used to develop and validate, respectively, a predictive model of burn mortality. Logistic regression was used to model the odds of mortality with respect to age, gender, % body surface area burned (BSAB), co-existent trauma, inhalation injury, pneumonia, and co-morbid illness. Performance of the predictive model was assessed using a deviance statistic, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) statistic.

RESULTS

The predictive model that demonstrated optimal performance included the variables age, percent total BSAB, inhalation injury, co-existent trauma, and pneumonia. The area under the ROC curve for this model was 0.94 and the HL statistic was 16.0. The inclusion of additional variables, i.e., gender, co-morbid illness, did not improve the performance of the model despite reduction in the model deviance. When the predictive model was applied to the validation data source, the area under the ROC curve was 0.87 and the HL statistic was 10.0, indicating good discrimination and calibration.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that a comprehensive predictive model of burn mortality incorporating certain variables not previously considered in other models provides superior predictive ability.

摘要

背景

早期预测严重烧伤后死亡的研究主要集中在年龄和烧伤面积;最近的研究纳入了吸入性损伤和肺炎。性别、合并疾病和并存创伤与烧伤死亡率有关,但很少被纳入预测模型。

方法

国家烧伤资料库(NBR)和国家创伤数据库(NTDB)分别提供了68661例烧伤患者的数据(分别为54219例和14442例),用于建立和验证烧伤死亡率预测模型。采用逻辑回归对年龄、性别、烧伤体表面积百分比(BSAB)、并存创伤、吸入性损伤、肺炎和合并疾病的死亡几率进行建模。使用偏差统计量、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和霍斯默-莱梅肖(HL)统计量评估预测模型的性能。

结果

表现最佳的预测模型包括年龄、总BSAB百分比、吸入性损伤、并存创伤和肺炎等变量。该模型的ROC曲线下面积为0.94,HL统计量为16.0。纳入其他变量,即性别、合并疾病,尽管模型偏差有所降低,但并未改善模型性能。当将预测模型应用于验证数据源时,ROC曲线下面积为0.87,HL统计量为10.0,表明具有良好的区分度和校准度。

结论

本研究结果表明,一个综合了某些其他模型未考虑的变量的烧伤死亡率预测模型具有更好的预测能力。

相似文献

1
Improving the ability to predict mortality among burn patients.提高烧伤患者死亡率的预测能力。
Burns. 2008 May;34(3):320-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
2
Combining early coagulation and inflammatory status improves prediction of mortality in burned and nonburned trauma patients.结合早期凝血和炎症状态可改善烧伤和非烧伤创伤患者死亡率的预测。
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2 Suppl):S188-94. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160a5a3.
3
[Integration of preexisting diseases and risk factors in the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI)].[将既往疾病和危险因素纳入简化烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)中]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2003 Mar;38(3):151-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37773.
4
The impact of injury coding schemes on predicting hospital mortality after pediatric injury.损伤编码方案对预测小儿损伤后医院死亡率的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):639-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00446.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
5
The FLAMES score accurately predicts mortality risk in burn patients.FLAMES评分能准确预测烧伤患者的死亡风险。
J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):636-45. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181840c6d.
6
Bayesian logistic injury severity score: a method for predicting mortality using international classification of disease-9 codes.贝叶斯逻辑斯蒂损伤严重度评分:一种使用国际疾病分类第9版编码预测死亡率的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 May;15(5):466-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00105.x.
7
The trauma risk adjustment model: a new model for evaluating trauma care.创伤风险调整模型:一种评估创伤护理的新模型。
Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):1040-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a6cd97.
8
Development and validation of a model for prediction of mortality in patients with acute burn injury.急性烧伤患者死亡率预测模型的开发与验证
Br J Surg. 2009 Jan;96(1):111-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6329.
9
Evaluation of mortality following severe burns injury in Hungary: external validation of a prediction model developed on Belgian burn data.评估匈牙利严重烧伤患者的死亡率:对基于比利时烧伤数据开发的预测模型进行外部验证。
Burns. 2009 Nov;35(7):1009-14. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.12.017. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
10
Simplified estimates of the probability of death after burn injuries: extending and updating the baux score.烧伤后死亡概率的简化估计:扩展和更新博克斯评分
J Trauma. 2010 Mar;68(3):690-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c453b3.

引用本文的文献

1
Major trauma and comorbidity: a scoping review.重大创伤与共病:一项范围综述
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 12;51(1):133. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02805-x.
2
Prognostic factors in patients with burns.烧伤患者的预后因素
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52(4):330-335. doi: 10.5114/ait.2020.97497.
3
Risk Models to Predict Mortality in Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.预测烧伤患者死亡率的风险模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Dec 16;10(12):e4694. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004694. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Risk Factors For Death And Prognosis Value Of Revised Baux Score For Burn Patients With Inhalation Injury.烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者的死亡危险因素及改良Baux评分的预后价值
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2022 Mar 31;35(1):41-45.
5
Prognosis value of revised Baux score among burn patients in developing country.修订版博克斯评分在发展中国家烧伤患者中的预后价值
Int J Burns Trauma. 2021 Jun 15;11(3):197-201. eCollection 2021.
6
Clinical outcome and comparison of burn injury scoring systems in burn patient in Indonesia.印度尼西亚烧伤患者的临床结局及烧伤损伤评分系统比较
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;11(3):331-334. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
7
Predicting Burn Mortality Using a Simple Novel Prediction Model.使用一种简单的新型预测模型预测烧伤死亡率。
Indian J Plast Surg. 2021 Jan;54(1):46-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721867. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
8
Nurse Staffing, the Clinical Work Environment, and Burn Patient Mortality.护士人力配置、临床工作环境与烧伤患者死亡率。
J Burn Care Res. 2020 Jul 3;41(4):796-802. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa061.
9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2019 Mar 31;32(1):22-29.
10
Age is associated with increased mortality in the RETTS-A triage scale.在RETTS - A分诊量表中,年龄与死亡率增加相关。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 May 23;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1157-4.