Fraenkel Liana, McGraw Sarah
VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8031, USA.
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306784. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
Variability in reports of patients' preferences to participate in decision making may be due in part to a lack of understanding about how patients conceptualize their participation. The authors sought to learn more about how patients view their involvement in decisions related to their health care.
The authors conducted individual interviews to allow patients to frame the decision-making process from their own perspective. The constant comparative-method approach to analysis was employed to ensure that the analysts defined the codes in a consistent manner.
Twenty-six persons were interviewed. The main themes discussed by the participants reflecting how they viewed their involvement in medical decision making are the following: 1) decision making is often an ongoing process in which patient participation may change over time, 2) decision making is performed within an extended social context, 3) the decisions patients report being involved in are often distinct from those traditionally studied (choice of treatment or screening strategies), 4) patient involvement in decision making occurs in response to physicians' recommendations, and 5) patients make choices in the context of their specific illness perceptions.
Participants in this study view their participation in decision making as including ideas distinct from those traditionally discussed by researchers. These findings suggest that the variability in patient participation noted in previous studies may be due in part to limitations in study design.
患者参与决策偏好报告的差异可能部分归因于对患者如何理解其参与方式缺乏了解。作者试图进一步了解患者如何看待自己参与与医疗保健相关的决策。
作者进行了个人访谈,以便患者从自己的角度阐述决策过程。采用持续比较法进行分析,以确保分析人员以一致的方式定义编码。
对26人进行了访谈。参与者讨论的反映他们如何看待自己参与医疗决策的主要主题如下:1)决策通常是一个持续的过程,患者的参与可能会随时间而变化;2)决策是在扩展的社会背景下进行的;3)患者报告参与的决策通常与传统研究的决策(治疗或筛查策略的选择)不同;4)患者参与决策是对医生建议的回应;5)患者在其特定疾病认知的背景下做出选择。
本研究的参与者认为他们参与决策的方式包含与研究人员传统讨论不同的观点。这些发现表明,先前研究中指出的患者参与差异可能部分归因于研究设计的局限性。