• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与医疗决策:患者视角

Participation in medical decision making: the patients' perspective.

作者信息

Fraenkel Liana, McGraw Sarah

机构信息

VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8031, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306784. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X07306784
PMID:17873253
Abstract

PURPOSE

Variability in reports of patients' preferences to participate in decision making may be due in part to a lack of understanding about how patients conceptualize their participation. The authors sought to learn more about how patients view their involvement in decisions related to their health care.

METHODS

The authors conducted individual interviews to allow patients to frame the decision-making process from their own perspective. The constant comparative-method approach to analysis was employed to ensure that the analysts defined the codes in a consistent manner.

RESULTS

Twenty-six persons were interviewed. The main themes discussed by the participants reflecting how they viewed their involvement in medical decision making are the following: 1) decision making is often an ongoing process in which patient participation may change over time, 2) decision making is performed within an extended social context, 3) the decisions patients report being involved in are often distinct from those traditionally studied (choice of treatment or screening strategies), 4) patient involvement in decision making occurs in response to physicians' recommendations, and 5) patients make choices in the context of their specific illness perceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in this study view their participation in decision making as including ideas distinct from those traditionally discussed by researchers. These findings suggest that the variability in patient participation noted in previous studies may be due in part to limitations in study design.

摘要

目的

患者参与决策偏好报告的差异可能部分归因于对患者如何理解其参与方式缺乏了解。作者试图进一步了解患者如何看待自己参与与医疗保健相关的决策。

方法

作者进行了个人访谈,以便患者从自己的角度阐述决策过程。采用持续比较法进行分析,以确保分析人员以一致的方式定义编码。

结果

对26人进行了访谈。参与者讨论的反映他们如何看待自己参与医疗决策的主要主题如下:1)决策通常是一个持续的过程,患者的参与可能会随时间而变化;2)决策是在扩展的社会背景下进行的;3)患者报告参与的决策通常与传统研究的决策(治疗或筛查策略的选择)不同;4)患者参与决策是对医生建议的回应;5)患者在其特定疾病认知的背景下做出选择。

结论

本研究的参与者认为他们参与决策的方式包含与研究人员传统讨论不同的观点。这些发现表明,先前研究中指出的患者参与差异可能部分归因于研究设计的局限性。

相似文献

1
Participation in medical decision making: the patients' perspective.参与医疗决策:患者视角
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306784. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
2
Patient participation in clinical decision-making in nursing: A comparative study of nurses' and patients' perceptions.患者参与护理临床决策:护士与患者认知的比较研究
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Dec;15(12):1498-508. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01464.x.
3
Information and participation in decision-making about treatment: a qualitative study of the perceptions and preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.治疗相关信息及参与决策:一项关于类风湿关节炎患者认知与偏好的定性研究
J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):775-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023705.
4
Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.退伍军人对慢性心力衰竭护理的决策偏好及感知参与度
Heart Lung. 2008 Nov-Dec;37(6):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
5
Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.对信息的需求及参与治疗决策的情况:老年癌症患者的偏好及其医生的认知
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5275-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922.
6
Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making.相互冲突的规范:加拿大乡村家庭医生对临床实践指南和共同决策的看法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):79-84. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007052.
7
Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review.患者参与医疗决策的偏好:一项叙述性综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Feb;60(2):102-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003.
8
Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings.评估患者的参与度和决策质量:来自不同环境下常规实践研究的见解。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Oct;55(1):105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005.
9
Preferences of acutely ill patients for participation in medical decision-making.急性病患者参与医疗决策的偏好。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Apr;17(2):97-100. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021378.
10
"It's my body'': does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict?“这是我的身体”:患者参与决策是否会减少决策冲突?
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):522-32. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306782. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences in a Group of Patients with Cancer: A Grounded Theory.一组癌症患者的偏好:扎根理论
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Oct 15;15:2313-2326. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S328971. eCollection 2021.
2
Ileostomy or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: patient participation and decisional needs.回肠造口术或回肠储袋-肛门吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎:患者的参与和决策需求。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 19;21(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01916-0.
3
At Odds About the Odds: Women's Choices to Accept Osteoporosis Medications Do Not Closely Agree with Physician-Set Treatment Thresholds.
对几率存在分歧:女性接受骨质疏松症药物治疗的选择与医生设定的治疗阈值并不十分相符。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):276-282. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05384-x. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
Patient experience of treatment decision making for wet age-related macular degeneration disease: a qualitative study in China.中国湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性疾病治疗决策患者体验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):e031020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031020.
5
Social Influences on Peer Judgments about Chronic Pain and Disability.社会影响对同伴关于慢性疼痛和残疾判断的影响。
J Pain. 2019 Jun;20(6):698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
The effects of a pretreatment educational group programme on mental health treatment outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.一项预处理教育小组计划对心理健康治疗结果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 29;18(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3466-2.
7
The perspectives of patients with lithium-induced end-stage renal disease.锂诱导的终末期肾病患者的观点。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2018 Jun 2;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40345-018-0121-0.
8
Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden.谁希望参与医疗保健决策?比较英国和瑞典对个人参与和集体参与的偏好。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 14;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4534-y.
9
Validity of the Control Preferences Scale in patients with emotional disorders.情绪障碍患者中控制偏好量表的效度
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Nov 15;10:2351-2356. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S122377. eCollection 2016.
10
Treatment-related decisional conflict in patients with depressive and anxious disorders.抑郁和焦虑症患者中与治疗相关的决策冲突
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jun 10;10:1011-9. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S107299. eCollection 2016.