Suppr超能文献

谁希望参与医疗保健决策?比较英国和瑞典对个人参与和集体参与的偏好。

Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden.

作者信息

Fredriksson Mio, Eriksson Max, Tritter Jonathan

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22, UPPSALA, Sweden.

School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 14;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4534-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as positive for individuals, the health system, public health, as well as for communities and society as a whole. We investigated whether preferences for PPI differed between two countries with Beveridge type health systems-Sweden and England. We measured willingness to be involved in individual treatment decisions and in decisions about the organization and provision of local health and social care services.

METHODS

This was a comparative cross-sectional study of the general population's preferences. Together, the two samples included 3125 respondents; 1625 in England and 1500 in Sweden. Country differences were analysed in a multinomial regression model controlling for gender, age and educational attainment.

RESULTS

Overall, 68% of respondents wanted a passive patient role and 44% wanted to be involved in local decisions about organization and provision of services. In comparison with in Sweden, they were in England less likely to want a health professional such as a GP or consultant to make decisions about their treatment and also more likely to want to make their own decisions. They were also less likely to want to be involved in local service development decisions. An increased likelihood of wanting to be involved in organizational decision-making was associated with individuals wanting to make their own treatment decisions. Women were less likely to want health professionals to make decisions and more likely to want to be involved in organizational decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

An effective health system that ensures public health must integrate an effective approach to PPI both in individual treatment decisions and shaping local health and social care priorities. To be effective, involvement activities must take in to account the variation in the desire for involvement and the implications that this has for equity. More work is needed to understand the relationship between the desire to be involved and actually being involved, but both appear related to judgements of the impact of involvement on health care decisions.

摘要

背景

患者及公众参与(PPI)被视为对个人、卫生系统、公共卫生以及整个社区和社会都具有积极意义。我们调查了在拥有贝弗里奇式卫生系统的两个国家——瑞典和英国,对PPI的偏好是否存在差异。我们衡量了参与个体治疗决策以及关于当地卫生和社会护理服务的组织与提供决策的意愿。

方法

这是一项关于普通人群偏好的比较横断面研究。两个样本共计3125名受访者;英国有1625名,瑞典有1500名。在控制性别、年龄和教育程度的多项回归模型中分析国家间差异。

结果

总体而言,68% 的受访者希望扮演被动患者角色,44% 的受访者希望参与当地关于服务组织与提供方面的决策。与瑞典相比,英国受访者不太希望由全科医生或顾问等医疗专业人员做出治疗决策,而更倾向于自己做决定。他们也不太愿意参与当地服务发展决策。希望参与组织决策的可能性增加与希望自己做出治疗决策的个体相关。女性不太希望医疗专业人员做决策,而更有可能参与组织决策。

结论

一个确保公共卫生的有效卫生系统必须在个体治疗决策以及确定当地卫生和社会护理优先事项方面整合有效的PPI方法。为了有效,参与活动必须考虑到参与意愿的差异及其对公平性的影响。需要开展更多工作来理解参与意愿与实际参与之间的关系,但两者似乎都与对参与对医疗决策影响的判断有关。

相似文献

2
Getting involved: the extent and impact of patient and public involvement in the Swedish health system.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2020 Jul;15(3):325-340. doi: 10.1017/S174413311900015X. Epub 2019 May 3.
3
The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Mar;64(6):1297-310. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
5
Involvement that makes an impact on healthcare: Perceptions of the Swedish public.
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(4):471-477. doi: 10.1177/1403494817738692. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
6
Organizational values in general practice and public involvement: case studies in an urban district.
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 May;9(3):159-67. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00292.x.
7
Disentangling patient and public involvement in healthcare decisions: why the difference matters.
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Jan;39(1):95-111. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12483. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
8
Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar;56(5):1001-12. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00091-6.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

2
A meta-ethnography of shared decision-making in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11540-9.
6
Representativeness of personality and involvement preferences in a web-based survey on healthcare decision-making.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):851. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05717-1.
7
Public preferences regarding data linkage for research: a discrete choice experiment comparing Scotland and Sweden.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01139-5.
9
Involvement in maternal care by migrants and ethnic minorities: a narrative review.
Public Health Rev. 2020 Apr 7;41:5. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00121-w. eCollection 2020.
10
Trends in Shared Decision-Making Studies From 2009 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Front Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;7:384. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00384. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
5
Patient participation in decisions about disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional survey.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Oct 4;15:333. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-333.
7
Is patient choice democratizing Swedish primary care?
Health Policy. 2013 Jun;111(1):95-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
8
What is the evidence base for public involvement in health-care policy?: results of a systematic scoping review.
Health Expect. 2015 Apr;18(2):153-65. doi: 10.1111/hex.12038. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
9
Theoretical directions for an emancipatory concept of patient and public involvement.
Health (London). 2012 Sep;16(5):531-47. doi: 10.1177/1363459312438563. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
10
Choice and privatisation in Swedish primary care.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Oct;6(4):549-69. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000216. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验