Fredriksson Mio, Eriksson Max, Tritter Jonathan
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22, UPPSALA, Sweden.
School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 14;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4534-y.
Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as positive for individuals, the health system, public health, as well as for communities and society as a whole. We investigated whether preferences for PPI differed between two countries with Beveridge type health systems-Sweden and England. We measured willingness to be involved in individual treatment decisions and in decisions about the organization and provision of local health and social care services.
This was a comparative cross-sectional study of the general population's preferences. Together, the two samples included 3125 respondents; 1625 in England and 1500 in Sweden. Country differences were analysed in a multinomial regression model controlling for gender, age and educational attainment.
Overall, 68% of respondents wanted a passive patient role and 44% wanted to be involved in local decisions about organization and provision of services. In comparison with in Sweden, they were in England less likely to want a health professional such as a GP or consultant to make decisions about their treatment and also more likely to want to make their own decisions. They were also less likely to want to be involved in local service development decisions. An increased likelihood of wanting to be involved in organizational decision-making was associated with individuals wanting to make their own treatment decisions. Women were less likely to want health professionals to make decisions and more likely to want to be involved in organizational decisions.
An effective health system that ensures public health must integrate an effective approach to PPI both in individual treatment decisions and shaping local health and social care priorities. To be effective, involvement activities must take in to account the variation in the desire for involvement and the implications that this has for equity. More work is needed to understand the relationship between the desire to be involved and actually being involved, but both appear related to judgements of the impact of involvement on health care decisions.
患者及公众参与(PPI)被视为对个人、卫生系统、公共卫生以及整个社区和社会都具有积极意义。我们调查了在拥有贝弗里奇式卫生系统的两个国家——瑞典和英国,对PPI的偏好是否存在差异。我们衡量了参与个体治疗决策以及关于当地卫生和社会护理服务的组织与提供决策的意愿。
这是一项关于普通人群偏好的比较横断面研究。两个样本共计3125名受访者;英国有1625名,瑞典有1500名。在控制性别、年龄和教育程度的多项回归模型中分析国家间差异。
总体而言,68% 的受访者希望扮演被动患者角色,44% 的受访者希望参与当地关于服务组织与提供方面的决策。与瑞典相比,英国受访者不太希望由全科医生或顾问等医疗专业人员做出治疗决策,而更倾向于自己做决定。他们也不太愿意参与当地服务发展决策。希望参与组织决策的可能性增加与希望自己做出治疗决策的个体相关。女性不太希望医疗专业人员做决策,而更有可能参与组织决策。
一个确保公共卫生的有效卫生系统必须在个体治疗决策以及确定当地卫生和社会护理优先事项方面整合有效的PPI方法。为了有效,参与活动必须考虑到参与意愿的差异及其对公平性的影响。需要开展更多工作来理解参与意愿与实际参与之间的关系,但两者似乎都与对参与对医疗决策影响的判断有关。