Choe Jung-Yoon, Park Sung-Hoon, Kim Ji-Young, Shin Im-Hee, Kim Seong-Kyu
Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Namgu, Daegu, South Korea.
Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;27(4):483-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-007-0732-9. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
A number of cross-sectional analysis studies have been conducted to determine the relationships between serum uric acid and related variables or clinical manifestations. However, few data related to changes in serum uric acid within the same cohort population at two separate periods of time have been reported. In this study, we investigated the changes in serum uric acid in a population from baseline to 1-year follow-up and examined the associations with related parameters and medical conditions. A total of 1,437 eligible male subjects who underwent 2 medical examinations at a health promotion center at an interval of approximately 12 months were enrolled in this study. Data were obtained from routine physical assessments such as blood pressure, height, waist circumference, blood analyses for liver function, renal function, lipid profile, and electrolytes, along with standardized questionnaires including self-reported data. In this population, serum uric acid was significantly increased at 1-year follow-up compared with the baseline level (5.94 +/- 1.20 vs 5.99 +/- 1.22, p = 0.003). Changes of some confounders such as total bilirubin, creatinine, BUN, phosphorus, total cholesterol, and triglyceride were significantly associated with changes in serum uric acid. Among them, serum creatinine may be the most influential in determining the serum uric acid level (odds ratio = 21.691, 95%CI = 5.110-92.086). A change of serum uric acid over 1 year did not seem to affect changes in the clinical status for some medical conditions including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. This analysis showed that a change in serum creatinine level between baseline and 1-year follow-up might be the most potent factor affecting a change in serum uric acid in healthy, male subjects. Changes of serum uric acid did not show any meaningful impact on the development of hypertension, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome in this 1-year follow-up study.
已经进行了多项横断面分析研究,以确定血清尿酸与相关变量或临床表现之间的关系。然而,关于同一队列人群在两个不同时间点血清尿酸变化的数据报道较少。在本研究中,我们调查了一组人群从基线到1年随访期间血清尿酸的变化,并检查了其与相关参数和疾病状况的关联。本研究共纳入了1437名符合条件的男性受试者,他们在一家健康促进中心每隔约12个月接受两次体检。数据来自常规身体评估,如血压、身高、腰围、肝功能、肾功能、血脂和电解质的血液分析,以及包括自我报告数据的标准化问卷。在这组人群中,与基线水平相比,1年随访时血清尿酸显著升高(5.94±1.20 vs 5.99±1.22,p = 0.003)。一些混杂因素如总胆红素、肌酐、尿素氮、磷、总胆固醇和甘油三酯的变化与血清尿酸的变化显著相关。其中,血清肌酐可能对血清尿酸水平的影响最大(优势比=21.691,95%可信区间=5.110-92.086)。在1年的时间里,血清尿酸的变化似乎并未影响包括高血压、糖尿病、心血管疾病和代谢综合征在内的一些疾病的临床状况变化。该分析表明,基线和1年随访之间血清肌酐水平的变化可能是影响健康男性受试者血清尿酸变化的最主要因素。在这项1年的随访研究中,血清尿酸的变化对高血压、心力衰竭、糖尿病和代谢综合征的发生没有显示出任何有意义的影响。