• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测在快速认知任务中个体差异和群体差异的大小。

Predicting the size of individual and group differences on speeded cognitive tasks.

作者信息

Chen Jing, Hale Sandra, Myerson Joel

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan 49401, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Jun;14(3):534-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03194103.

DOI:10.3758/bf03194103
PMID:17874602
Abstract

An a priori test of the difference engine model (Myerson, Hale, Zheng, Jenkins, & Widaman, 2003) was conducted using a large, diverse sample of individuals who performed three speeded verbal tasks and three speeded visuospatial tasks. Results demonstrated that, as predicted by the model, the group standard deviation (SD) on any task was proportional to the amount of processing required by that task. Both individual performances as well as those of fast and slow subgroups could be accurately predicted by the model using no free parameters, just an individual or subgroup's mean z-score and the values of theoretical constructs estimated from fits to the group SDs. Taken together, these results are consistent with post hoc analyses reported by Myerson et al. and provide even stronger supporting evidence. In particular, the ability to make quantitative predictions without using any free parameters provides the clearest demonstration to date of the power of an analytic approach on the basis of the difference engine.

摘要

使用大量不同的个体样本进行了差异引擎模型的先验测试(迈尔森、黑尔、郑、詹金斯和维达曼,2003年),这些个体完成了三项言语速度任务和三项视觉空间速度任务。结果表明,正如该模型所预测的,任何任务的组标准差(SD)与该任务所需的加工量成正比。该模型无需使用自由参数,仅使用个体或亚组的平均z分数以及根据组标准差拟合估计的理论构念值,就能准确预测个体表现以及快速和慢速亚组的表现。总体而言,这些结果与迈尔森等人报告的事后分析一致,并提供了更强有力的支持证据。特别是,无需使用任何自由参数就能进行定量预测的能力,为基于差异引擎的分析方法的强大功能提供了迄今为止最清晰的证明。

相似文献

1
Predicting the size of individual and group differences on speeded cognitive tasks.预测在快速认知任务中个体差异和群体差异的大小。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Jun;14(3):534-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03194103.
2
Individual differences on speeded cognitive tasks: comment on Chen, Hale, and Myerson (2007).快速认知任务中的个体差异:对陈、黑尔和迈尔森(2007年)的评论
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):1007-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03194136.
3
Making strides in modeling individual differences: reply to Leite, Ratcliff, and White (2007).在建模个体差异方面取得进展:回复 Leite、Ratcliff 和 White(2007)。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):756-62. doi: 10.3758/pbr.17.5.756.
4
The difference engine: a model of diversity in speeded cognition.差异引擎:快速认知中的多样性模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):262-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03196491.
5
General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: the roles of age and ability.一般词汇加工减慢与语义启动效应:年龄和能力的作用
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1997 Jun;96(1-2):83-101. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00002-4.
6
Converging evidence that visuospatial cognition is more age-sensitive than verbal cognition.越来越多的证据表明,视觉空间认知比语言认知对年龄更敏感。
Psychol Aging. 2000 Mar;15(1):157-75. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.15.1.157.
7
Working memory and interference: a comment on Jenkins, Myerson, Hale, and Fry (1999).
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Dec;7(4):727-33; discussion 734-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03213013.
8
Subjective reports of stimulus, response, and decision times in speeded tasks: how accurate are decision time reports?在快速任务中,对刺激、反应和决策时间的主观报告:决策时间报告有多准确?
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):1013-36. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
9
Reading and lexical-decision tasks generate different patterns of individual variability as a function of condition difficulty.阅读和词汇判断任务会根据条件难度产生不同的个体变异模式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1161-1169. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1335-3.
10
Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 1: Decision making under physical performance pressure in elite athletes.神枪手、扑克玩家与斗鸡1:精英运动员在身体表现压力下的决策制定
Prog Brain Res. 2017;234:291-316. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Developmental Trajectory of Anticipation: Insights from Sequential Comparative Judgments.预期的发展轨迹:来自序列比较判断的见解
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 3;13(8):646. doi: 10.3390/bs13080646.
2
Event memory uniquely predicts memory for large-scale space.事件记忆独特地预测了大范围空间的记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Feb;47(2):212-228. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0860-2.
3
Slowing in reading and picture naming: the effects of aging and developmental dyslexia.阅读和图片命名速度减慢:衰老与发育性阅读障碍的影响

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of group differences in processing speed: where are the models of processing?处理速度的组间差异分析:处理模型在哪里?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Aug;11(4):755-69. doi: 10.3758/bf03196631.
2
A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.二择反应时的序贯抽样模型比较
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):333-67. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333.
3
The difference engine: a model of diversity in speeded cognition.差异引擎:快速认知中的多样性模型。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Oct;235(10):3093-3109. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5041-1. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
4
Reading and lexical-decision tasks generate different patterns of individual variability as a function of condition difficulty.阅读和词汇判断任务会根据条件难度产生不同的个体变异模式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1161-1169. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1335-3.
5
A simultaneous examination of two forms of working memory training: Evidence for near transfer only.两种工作记忆训练形式的同步检验:仅近迁移的证据
Mem Cognit. 2016 Oct;44(7):1014-37. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0616-9.
6
Age-related differences in inhibitory control predict audiovisual speech perception.抑制控制方面与年龄相关的差异可预测视听言语感知。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Sep;30(3):634-46. doi: 10.1037/pag0000033. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
Individuals with low working memory spans show greater interference from irrelevant information because of poor source monitoring, not greater activation.工作记忆广度较低的个体由于源监控能力差,会受到无关信息的更大干扰,而不是更大的激活。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Apr;43(3):357-66. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0465-3.
8
Interleukin-6, age, and corpus callosum integrity.白细胞介素-6、年龄与胼胝体完整性
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 4;9(9):e106521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106521. eCollection 2014.
9
Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory.事件分割能力能独特地预测事件记忆。
Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):241-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
10
Cognitive processing speed in older adults: relationship with white matter integrity.老年人认知加工速度:与脑白质完整性的关系。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050425. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):262-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03196491.
4
Individual and developmental differences in working memory across the life span.个体一生中工作记忆的个体差异与发展差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Mar;6(1):28-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03210810.
5
Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time.明确模拟衰老对反应时间的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Mar;7(1):1-25. doi: 10.3758/bf03210723.
6
Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency.信息处理速率和数量的个体差异:对反应潜伏期群体差异的影响。
Psychol Bull. 1999 Nov;125(6):777-99. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777.
7
Laws of visual choice reaction time.视觉选择反应时间的规律。
Psychol Rev. 1974 Jan;81(1):75-98. doi: 10.1037/h0035867.