• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在快速任务中,对刺激、反应和决策时间的主观报告:决策时间报告有多准确?

Subjective reports of stimulus, response, and decision times in speeded tasks: how accurate are decision time reports?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):1013-36. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.001
PMID:20580268
Abstract

Four experiments examined how accurately participants can report the times of their own decisions. Within an auditory reaction time (RT) task, participants reported the time at which (a) the tone was presented, (b) they decided on the response, or (c) the response key was pressed. Decision time reports were checked for plausibility against the actual RTs, and we compared the effects of experimental manipulations on these two measures to see whether the reported decision times showed appropriate effects. In addition, we estimated the amount of error associated with individual decision time reports by checking how often participants' decision time reports were implausibly early (i.e., before stimulus onset) or late (i.e., after response), and by using several quantitative models. Overall, the results suggest that decision time reports are not very accurate but they may be usable for some purposes.

摘要

四项实验考察了参与者报告自己决策时间的准确性。在听觉反应时(RT)任务中,参与者报告了(a)声调呈现的时间、(b)他们决定做出反应的时间,或(c)按下反应键的时间。对决策时间报告进行了真实性检查,以与实际 RT 进行比较,并比较了实验操作对这两个测量值的影响,以确定报告的决策时间是否显示出适当的效果。此外,我们通过检查参与者的决策时间报告是否不切实际地过早(即,在刺激出现之前)或过晚(即,在响应之后)的频率,以及使用几种定量模型,估计了与个别决策时间报告相关的误差量。总体而言,结果表明决策时间报告不太准确,但它们可能对某些目的有用。

相似文献

1
Subjective reports of stimulus, response, and decision times in speeded tasks: how accurate are decision time reports?在快速任务中,对刺激、反应和决策时间的主观报告:决策时间报告有多准确?
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):1013-36. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
2
We infer rather than perceive the moment we decided to act.我们是推断而非感知到自己决定行动的那一刻。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02254.x.
3
Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.刺激-反应兼容性对棒球运动员专家级表现的中介作用
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 16;1189:179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.096. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
4
Selective attention and subjective confidence calibration.选择性注意与主观信心校准。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):353-68. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.2.353.
5
Effects of practice on task architecture: combined evidence from interference experiments and random-walk models of decision making.练习对任务架构的影响:来自干扰实验和决策的随机游走模型的综合证据。
Cognition. 2011 Apr;119(1):81-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.010. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
6
Erroneous knowledge of results affects decision and memory processes on timing tasks.对结果的错误认知会影响计时任务中的决策和记忆过程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1468-82. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1468.
7
Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: a diffusion model approach.反应时间与时间顺序判断之间的分离:一种扩散模型方法。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):394-412. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.394.
8
Subjective agency and awareness of shared actions.主观能动性和共同行动的意识。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.007. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
9
Gradations of awareness in a modified sequence learning task.改良序列学习任务中的意识分级
Conscious Cogn. 2007 Dec;16(4):809-37. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
10
Temporal order judgment and simple reaction times: evidence for a common processing system.时间顺序判断与简单反应时间:关于一个共同处理系统的证据。
J Vis. 2007 Apr 27;7(6):11. doi: 10.1167/7.6.11.

引用本文的文献

1
A spatial-attentional mechanism underlies action-related distortions of time judgment.一种空间注意力机制是与动作相关的时间判断扭曲的基础。
Elife. 2024 Feb 9;12:e91825. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91825.
2
Manipulations of Libet clock parameters affect intention timing awareness.对利贝特时钟参数的操作会影响意图定时意识。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 24;12(1):20249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23513-1.
3
The implicit sense of agency is not a perceptual effect but is a judgment effect.内隐主体感不是一种知觉效应,而是一种判断效应。
Cogn Process. 2022 Feb;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01066-x. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
4
Anticipating cognitive effort: roles of perceived error-likelihood and time demands.预期认知努力:感知错误可能性和时间需求的作用。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):1033-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0943-x. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
Piercing of Consciousness as a Threshold-Crossing Operation.意识穿刺:阈限跨越的操作。
Curr Biol. 2017 Aug 7;27(15):2285-2295.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.047. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
Mind wandering at the fingertips: automatic parsing of subjective states based on response time variability.指尖上的思绪漫游:基于反应时变异的主观状态自动解析。
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 5;4:573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00573. eCollection 2013.