Graen George B
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Am Psychol. 2007 Sep;62(6):604-5. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X62.6.604.
Comments on the article by R. J. Hackman and R. Wageman which presented some directions for leadership research. Hackman and Wageman organized their article around their five reject-accept questions suggesting new directions. The current author discusses how each of the questions appears far too timid for real progress in sorting out the chaff from the grain, but points out that the Hackman and Wageman article was a critique of five companion articles and made a substantial contribution to the literature.
对R. J. 哈克曼和R. 瓦格曼所著文章的评论，该文章为领导力研究提供了一些方向。哈克曼和瓦格曼围绕他们提出新方向的五个“否定 - 肯定”问题来组织文章。本文作者讨论了这些问题中的每一个对于从糟粕中筛选出精华以取得实际进展而言似乎都过于保守，但指出哈克曼和瓦格曼的文章是对五篇相关文章的批判，并且对该文献做出了重大贡献。
