• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有和未患痴呆症的老年人的偏好与生活评估:可靠性、稳定性及代理知识

Preferences and life evaluations of older adults with and without dementia: reliability, stability, and proxy knowledge.

作者信息

Carpenter Brian D, Kissel Emily C, Lee Monica M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2007 Sep;22(3):650-5. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.650.

DOI:10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.650
PMID:17874963
Abstract

This study assessed the reliability and stability of care preferences and life evaluations among older adults with and without dementia. The study also examined spouse proxy predictions of partner responses. Test-retest reliability over 1 week, stability over 1 year, and proxy knowledge were all moderate to good, but lower for people with dementia. In all 3 areas, however, there was broad interindividual variability. People with dementia may become less reliable and stable in their self-reports, and some spouse proxies may have flawed knowledge about their partner, but dementia status alone is not sufficient to presume poor reliability or knowledge.

摘要

本研究评估了患有和未患有痴呆症的老年人护理偏好和生活评价的可靠性及稳定性。该研究还考察了配偶对伴侣反应的代理预测。1周内的重测信度、1年内的稳定性以及代理知晓度均为中等至良好,但痴呆症患者的这些指标较低。然而,在所有这三个方面,个体间存在广泛差异。痴呆症患者在自我报告中可能变得不那么可靠和稳定,一些配偶代理人可能对其伴侣的了解存在偏差,但仅痴呆症状态不足以推断可靠性差或知晓度低。

相似文献

1
Preferences and life evaluations of older adults with and without dementia: reliability, stability, and proxy knowledge.患有和未患痴呆症的老年人的偏好与生活评估:可靠性、稳定性及代理知识
Psychol Aging. 2007 Sep;22(3):650-5. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.650.
2
Development of a new measure of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: DEMQOL.为痴呆症患者开发一种新的健康相关生活质量测量方法:痴呆症生活质量量表(DEMQOL)
Psychol Med. 2007 May;37(5):737-46. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706009469. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
3
Agreement between dementia patient report and proxy reports using the Nottingham Health Profile.使用诺丁汉健康量表时痴呆症患者报告与代理人报告之间的一致性。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;19(11):1026-34. doi: 10.1002/gps.1191.
4
Can people with mild to moderate dementia provide reliable answers about their quality of life?轻度至中度痴呆症患者能否就其生活质量给出可靠答案?
Age Ageing. 2007 Nov;36(6):663-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm077. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
5
Self and proxy rating of quality of life in adults with intellectual disabilities: results from the DISQOL study.智力残疾成年人的自我和代理生活质量评定:来自 DISQOL 研究的结果。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Sep-Oct;31(5):1015-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 May 15.
6
Assessing quality of life of older people with dementia: a comparison of quantitative self-report and proxy accounts.评估痴呆老年人的生活质量:定量自评与代理报告的比较。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Oct;68(10):2237-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05912.x. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
7
Preferences in end-of-life care of older persons: after-death interviews with proxy respondents.老年人临终关怀偏好:对代理受访者的死后访谈。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Dec;59(12):2467-77. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.006.
8
Wives' struggle in living through treatment decisions for husbands with advanced Alzheimer's disease.妻子们在经历为患有晚期阿尔茨海默病的丈夫做出治疗决策时的挣扎。
J Nurs Law. 2000 May;7(1):21-39.
9
QUALIDEM: development and evaluation of a dementia specific quality of life instrument--validation.QUALIDEM:一种痴呆症特定生活质量量表的开发与评估——效度验证
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 May;22(5):424-30. doi: 10.1002/gps.1692.
10
Comparison of older adult subject and proxy responses on the SF-36 health-related quality of life instrument.老年人受试者与代理人对SF-36健康相关生活质量量表回答的比较。
Aging Ment Health. 2001 May;5(2):136-42. doi: 10.1080/13607860120038357.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance Care Planning in the Context of Dementia: Defining Concordance.痴呆症背景下的预先医疗指示规划:定义一致性。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae029.
2
Clinician approaches to communicating a dementia diagnosis: An interview study.临床医生在诊断痴呆症时的沟通方法:一项访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0267161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267161. eCollection 2022.
3
Quality of Life Scores for Nursing Home Residents are Stable Over Time: Evidence from Minnesota.养老院居民的生活质量评分随时间保持稳定:来自明尼苏达州的证据。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2022 Sep 3;34(5):755-768. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2021.2022949. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Reconsidering Gold Standards for Surrogate Decision Making for People with Dementia.重新考虑痴呆症患者替代决策的黄金标准。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;44(4):641-647. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2021.08.002.
5
Longitudinal Comparison of Stability and Sensitivity in Quality of Life Scores Among Nursing Home Residents With and Without Diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.有和没有阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症诊断的养老院居民生活质量评分稳定性和敏感性的纵向比较
Innov Aging. 2021 Jul 21;5(3):igab024. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab024. eCollection 2021.
6
Longitudinal differences in everyday preferences: Comparisons between people with cognitive impairment and their care partners.日常偏好的纵向差异:认知障碍者与其护理伙伴之间的比较。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 8;37(1). doi: 10.1002/gps.5620.
7
Predictors of the importance of everyday preferences for older adults with cognitive impairment.预测认知障碍老年人日常偏好重要性的因素。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 Mar;34(3):287-294. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220003956. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
A dyadic perspective on assessment in Alzheimer's dementia: Supporting both care partners across the disease continuum.阿尔茨海默病痴呆评估的二元视角:在疾病全过程中支持双方护理伙伴。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2020 Aug 28;6(1):e12037. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12037. eCollection 2020.
9
Methods to Assess Patient Preferences in Old Age Pharmacotherapy - A Systematic Review.评估老年药物治疗中患者偏好的方法——一项系统评价
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Mar 4;14:467-497. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S236964. eCollection 2020.
10
Differences in Assessment of Everyday Preferences Between People With Cognitive Impairment and Their Care Partners: The Role of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms.认知障碍患者及其照护者日常偏好评估的差异:神经精神症状的作用。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;28(10):1070-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.01.189. Epub 2020 Feb 6.