Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0267161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267161. eCollection 2022.
Individuals with cognitive impairment and their families place a high value on receiving a dementia diagnosis, but clinician approaches vary. There is a need for research investigating experiences of giving and receiving dementia diagnoses. The current study aimed to investigate clinician approaches to giving dementia diagnoses as part of a larger study investigating patient, caregiver, and clinician experiences during the diagnosis encounter.
Investigators conducted telephone interviews with Florida-based clinicians who give dementia diagnoses either rarely or commonly. Interviews employed a semi-structured interview guide querying communication practices used by clinicians when giving dementia diagnoses and how clinicians learned to give dementia diagnoses. Investigators used a descriptive qualitative design to conduct a thematic analysis of data.
Fifteen Florida-based clinicians participated, representing diverse backgrounds related to gender, race/ethnicity, specialty, and practice setting. Participants reported using patient- and family-centered communication practices including checking patient understanding, communicating empathically, and involving family members. Some clinicians explicitly asked patients and/or family members about their preferences regarding diagnosis disclosure; many clinicians tailored their disclosure based on patient and family characteristics or reactions. Some clinicians reported using specific diagnoses, while others used general terms such as "memory disorder." Clinicians reported positively framing information, including instilling hope, focusing on healthy behaviors, and discussing symptom management. Finally, clinicians provided patient/family education and arranged follow up. Clinicians reported learning approaches to dementia diagnosis disclosure through formal training and self-education.
Diverse Florida-based clinicians described dementia disclosure practices largely consistent with published guidance, but clinicians varied on approaches relating to soliciting patient disclosure preferences and terminology used. Clinicians caring for diverse populations described that cultural background affects the disclosure process, but more research is needed regarding this finding and best practices for individuals from different backgrounds.
认知障碍患者及其家属非常重视获得痴呆症诊断,但临床医生的方法各不相同。因此,有必要开展研究,调查提供和接受痴呆症诊断的相关经验。本研究旨在调查临床医生提供痴呆症诊断的方法,这是一项更大规模研究的一部分,该研究旨在调查患者、照护者和临床医生在诊断过程中的经历。
研究人员对佛罗里达州的临床医生进行了电话访谈,这些临床医生要么很少,要么经常进行痴呆症诊断。访谈采用半结构化访谈指南,询问临床医生在进行痴呆症诊断时使用的沟通实践,以及他们如何学习进行痴呆症诊断。研究人员采用描述性定性设计对数据进行主题分析。
共有 15 名来自佛罗里达州的临床医生参与了研究,他们在性别、种族/民族、专业和实践环境方面的背景多样。参与者报告说使用了以患者和家庭为中心的沟通实践,包括检查患者的理解、同理心沟通和让家庭成员参与。一些临床医生明确询问患者和/或家庭成员对诊断披露的偏好;许多临床医生根据患者和家庭的特征或反应来调整披露内容。一些临床医生报告使用特定的诊断,而另一些则使用一般术语,如“记忆障碍”。临床医生报告了积极的信息框架,包括灌输希望、关注健康行为和讨论症状管理。最后,临床医生为患者/家庭提供教育并安排后续跟进。临床医生报告说,他们通过正规培训和自我教育来学习痴呆症诊断披露的方法。
来自佛罗里达州的不同临床医生描述的痴呆症披露实践与已发表的指南基本一致,但在征求患者披露偏好和使用的术语方面,临床医生的方法存在差异。为不同人群提供护理的临床医生表示,文化背景会影响披露过程,但需要进一步研究这一发现以及针对不同背景人群的最佳实践。