• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种评估基于社区的慢性病干预措施中组织变革的方法。

A methodology for evaluating organizational change in community-based chronic disease interventions.

作者信息

Hanni Krista D, Mendoza Elsa, Snider John, Winkleby Marilyn A

机构信息

Monterey County Health Department, Salinas, California, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A105. Epub 2007 Sep 15.

PMID:17875249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2099270/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2003, the Monterey County Health Department, serving Salinas, California, was awarded one of 12 grants from the Steps to a HealthierUS Program to implement a 5-year, multiple-intervention community approach to reduce diabetes, asthma, and obesity. National adult and youth surveys to assess long-term outcomes are required by all Steps sites; however, site-specific surveys to assess intermediate outcomes are not required.

CONTEXT

Salinas is a medically underserved community of primarily Mexican American residents with high obesity rates and other poor health outcomes. The health department's Steps program has partnered with traditional organizations such as schools, senior centers, clinics, and faith-based organizations as well as novel organizations such as employers of agricultural workers and owners of taquerias.

METHODS

The health department and the Stanford Prevention Research Center developed new site-specific, community-focused partner surveys to assess intermediate outcomes to augment the nationally mandated surveys. These site-specific surveys will evaluate changes in organizational practices, policies, or both following the socioecological model, specifically the Spectrum of Prevention.

CONSEQUENCES

Our site-specific partner surveys helped to 1) identify promising new partners, select initial partners from neighborhoods with the greatest financial need, and identify potentially successful community approaches; and 2) provide data for evaluating intermediate outcomes matched to national long-term outcomes so that policy and organizational level changes could be assessed. These quantitative surveys also provide important context-specific qualitative data, identifying opportunities for strengthening community partnerships.

INTERPRETATION

Developing site-specific partner surveys in multisite intervention studies can provide important data to guide local program efforts and assess progress toward intermediate outcomes matched to long-term outcomes from nationally mandated surveys.

摘要

背景

2003年,为加利福尼亚州萨利纳斯市服务的蒙特雷县卫生局,获得了“迈向更健康美国计划”的12笔拨款之一,以实施一项为期5年的多干预社区方法,来减少糖尿病、哮喘和肥胖症。所有参与该计划的地点都需要进行全国性的成人和青少年调查,以评估长期结果;然而,并不要求进行针对特定地点的调查来评估中期结果。

背景情况

萨利纳斯是一个医疗服务不足的社区,主要居民为墨西哥裔美国人,肥胖率高且有其他不良健康状况。卫生局的“迈向更健康美国计划”项目已与学校、老年中心、诊所和宗教组织等传统组织以及农业工人雇主和墨西哥玉米卷餐馆老板等新型组织建立了合作关系。

方法

卫生局和斯坦福预防研究中心开发了新的针对特定地点、以社区为重点的合作伙伴调查问卷,以评估中期结果,作为对全国性强制调查的补充。这些特定地点的调查将根据社会生态模型,特别是预防范围,评估组织实践、政策或两者的变化。

结果

我们特定地点的合作伙伴调查有助于:1)识别有潜力的新合作伙伴,从经济需求最大的社区中挑选初始合作伙伴,并确定可能成功的社区方法;2)提供数据以评估与国家长期结果相匹配的中期结果,以便能够评估政策和组织层面的变化。这些定量调查还提供了重要的针对具体情况的定性数据,确定了加强社区伙伴关系的机会。

解读

在多地点干预研究中开展针对特定地点的合作伙伴调查,可以提供重要数据,以指导地方项目工作,并评估在与全国性强制调查的长期结果相匹配的中期结果方面取得的进展。

相似文献

1
A methodology for evaluating organizational change in community-based chronic disease interventions.一种评估基于社区的慢性病干预措施中组织变革的方法。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A105. Epub 2007 Sep 15.
2
Outcomes of Australian rural clinical schools: a decade of success building the rural medical workforce through the education and training continuum.澳大利亚农村临床医学院的成果:通过教育与培训连续统一体成功打造农村医疗劳动力的十年。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):2991. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
From program to policy: expanding the role of community coalitions.从项目到政策:扩大社区联盟的作用。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A103. Epub 2007 Sep 15.
4
Promoting Policy, Systems, and Environment Change to Prevent Chronic Disease: Lessons Learned From the King County Communities Putting Prevention to Work Initiative.促进政策、系统和环境变革以预防慢性病:从金县“让预防发挥作用”倡议社区汲取的经验教训。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;22(4):348-59. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000313.
5
Targeting the taqueria: implementing healthy food options at Mexican American restaurants.以墨西哥小餐馆为目标:在美籍墨西哥人餐馆推行健康食品选择。
Health Promot Pract. 2009 Apr;10(2 Suppl):91S-99S. doi: 10.1177/1524839908331268.
6
Forging successful academic-community partnerships with community health centers: the California statewide Area Health Education Center (AHEC) experience.与社区卫生中心建立成功的学术-社区伙伴关系:加利福尼亚州全州范围的区域健康教育中心(AHEC)经验。
Acad Med. 2014 Jan;89(1):33-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000069.
7
The impact of a community-based chronic disease prevention initiative: evaluation findings from Steps to Health King County.社区慢性病预防计划的影响:国王郡迈向健康计划的评估结果。
Health Educ Behav. 2011 Jun;38(3):222-30. doi: 10.1177/1090198110371463.
8
Evaluating the California Wellness Foundation's Health Improvement Initiative: a logic model approach.评估加州健康基金会的健康改善倡议:一种逻辑模型方法。
Health Promot Pract. 2003 Apr;4(2):146-56. doi: 10.1177/1524839902250767.
9
Building a community-academic partnership to improve health outcomes in an underserved community.建立社区-学术伙伴关系,改善服务不足社区的健康结果。
Public Health Nurs. 2010 Jan-Feb;27(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2009.00824.x.
10
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.降低儿童和青少年肥胖及相关慢性病风险:证据综合与“最佳实践”建议
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-based interventions in prepared-food sources: a systematic review.社区为基础的食品供应干预措施:系统评价。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 31;10:E180. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.130073.
2
Evaluation of risk factors and a community intervention to increase control and treatment of asthma in a low-income semi-rural California community.对加利福尼亚州一个低收入半农村社区中哮喘控制和治疗相关危险因素的评估及一项社区干预措施
J Asthma. 2008 Sep;45(7):568-74. doi: 10.1080/02770900802005269.
3
Predictors of trying to lose weight among overweight and obese Mexican-Americans: a signal detection analysis.超重和肥胖的墨西哥裔美国人中尝试减肥的预测因素:一项信号检测分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2009 Jan;12(1):64-73. doi: 10.1017/S136898000800181X. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
4
Social determinants of health: what, how, why, and now.健康的社会决定因素:是什么、如何、为何以及现状。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A85. Epub 2007 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten-year changes in cancer-related health behaviors and screening practices among Latino women and men in California.加利福尼亚州拉丁裔女性和男性与癌症相关的健康行为及筛查实践的十年变化。
Ethn Health. 2006 Feb;11(1):1-17. doi: 10.1080/13557850500391329.
2
Public health impact of community-based nutrition and lifestyle interventions.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Aug;59 Suppl 1:S66-75; discussion S76. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602176.
3
Bringing health policy issues front and center in the community: expanding the role of community health coalitions.将卫生政策问题置于社区的前沿和中心位置:扩大社区卫生联盟的作用。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Jan;2(1):A16. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
4
Multiple intervention research programs in community health.社区卫生领域的多项干预研究项目。
Can J Nurs Res. 2004 Mar;36(1):40-54.
5
Community-based interventions.基于社区的干预措施。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):529-33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.529.
6
The spectrum of prevention: developing a comprehensive approach to injury prevention.预防的范畴:制定全面的伤害预防方法。
Inj Prev. 1999 Sep;5(3):203-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.203.
7
Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion.将社会生态理论转化为社区健康促进指南。
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Mar-Apr;10(4):282-98. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282.
8
New directions for community intervention studies.社区干预研究的新方向。
Am J Public Health. 1996 Dec;86(12):1696-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.12.1696.
9
The future of community-based cardiovascular disease intervention studies.基于社区的心血管疾病干预研究的未来。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1369-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1369.