Stokols D
School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine 92717-515, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Mar-Apr;10(4):282-98. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282.
Health promotion programs often lack a clearly specified theoretical foundation or are based on narrowly conceived conceptual models. For example, lifestyle modification programs typically emphasize individually focused behavior change strategies, while neglecting the environmental underpinnings of health and illness. This article compares three distinct, yet complementary, theoretical perspectives on health promotion: behavioral change, environmental enhancement, and social ecological models. Key strengths and limitations of each perspective are examined, and core principles of social ecological theory are used to derive practical guidelines for designing and evaluating community health promotion programs. Directions for future health promotion research are discussed, including studies examining the role of intermediaries (e.g., corporate decision-makers, legislators) in promoting the well-being of others, and those evaluating the duration and scope of intervention outcomes.
健康促进项目往往缺乏明确规定的理论基础,或基于构思狭隘的概念模型。例如,生活方式改变项目通常强调以个体为重点的行为改变策略,而忽视健康与疾病的环境基础。本文比较了三种不同但互补的健康促进理论观点:行为改变、环境改善和社会生态模型。研究了每种观点的主要优势和局限性,并运用社会生态理论的核心原则得出设计和评估社区健康促进项目的实用指南。讨论了未来健康促进研究的方向,包括研究中介机构(如企业决策者、立法者)在促进他人福祉方面的作用,以及评估干预结果的持续时间和范围的研究。