Lowe Mandy, Rappolt Susan, Jaglal Susan, Macdonald Geraldine
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Interprofessional Education Leader, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007 Summer;27(3):143-8. doi: 10.1002/chp.117.
Although the use of reflection to facilitate learning and its application in practice has been widely advocated, there is little empirical research to establish whether or not health professionals use reflection to integrate learning into clinical practice. Particularly troublesome is the lack of empirically based theory underlying strategies to promote reflection and understand factors that influence its use in translating learning into practice. Occupational therapists participated in this case study, in which reflection and implementation of learning from a short course into practice were examined using a multimethod approach.
In phase one (n = 41), quantitative data were collected from a practice survey, the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS) and Commitment to Change (CTC) statements. In phase two (n = 33), follow-up CTC data were collected to quantify the extent of achievement of CTCs. Data from phases one and two were analyzed descriptively to inform the selection of interview participants (n = 10) in phase three of data collection.
Two models were generated. One model describes when reflection was used, and the second model explains factors influencing its use. Participants used reflection before, during, and after the course, and reflection was influenced by a range of factors associated with the course, practice context, and the individual.
The theory and models depicting the use of reflection may guide educators' use of reflective learning before, during, and after short courses.
尽管利用反思促进学习及其在实践中的应用已得到广泛倡导,但鲜有实证研究来确定卫生专业人员是否利用反思将学习融入临床实践。尤其麻烦的是,缺乏基于实证的理论来支撑促进反思以及理解影响其在将学习转化为实践中应用的因素的策略。职业治疗师参与了本案例研究,其中使用多方法途径考察了反思以及将短期课程中学到的知识应用到实践中的情况。
在第一阶段(n = 41),从实践调查、自我反思与洞察量表(SRIS)以及改变承诺(CTC)陈述中收集定量数据。在第二阶段(n = 33),收集后续的CTC数据以量化CTC的达成程度。对第一阶段和第二阶段的数据进行描述性分析,为第三阶段数据收集时选择访谈参与者(n = 10)提供参考。
生成了两个模型。一个模型描述了反思的使用时机,另一个模型解释了影响其使用的因素。参与者在课程之前、期间和之后都使用了反思,并且反思受到与课程、实践环境和个人相关的一系列因素的影响。
描述反思使用的理论和模型可能会指导教育工作者在短期课程之前、期间和之后对反思性学习的运用。