Rose Elaine A, Parfitt Gaynor
School of Physical Education, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Jun;29(3):281-309. doi: 10.1123/jsep.29.3.281.
Using a mixed-method approach, the aim of this study was to explore affective responses to exercise at intensities below-lactate threshold (LT), at-LT, and above-LT to test the proposals of the dual-mode model. These intensities were also contrasted with a self-selected intensity. Further, the factors that influenced the generation of those affective responses were explored. Nineteen women completed 20 min of treadmill exercise at each intensity. Affective valence and activation were measured, pre-, during and postexercise. Afterward, participants were asked why they had felt the way they had during each intensity. Results supported hypotheses showing affect to be least positive during the above-LT condition and most positive during the self-selected and below-LT conditions. Individual differences were greatest in the below-LT and at-LT conditions. Qualitative results showed that factors relating to perceptions of ability, interpretation of exercise intensity, exercise outcomes, focus of concentration, and perceptions of control influenced the affective response and contributed to the individual differences shown in the quantitative data.
采用混合方法,本研究旨在探究在低于乳酸阈值(LT)、达到乳酸阈值和高于乳酸阈值强度下对运动的情感反应,以检验双模式模型的相关假设。这些强度还与自我选择的强度进行了对比。此外,还探究了影响这些情感反应产生的因素。19名女性在每种强度下完成了20分钟的跑步机运动。在运动前、运动期间和运动后测量情感效价和激活程度。之后,参与者被问及在每种强度下产生相应感受的原因。结果支持了研究假设,表明在高于乳酸阈值的情况下情感最不积极,在自我选择和低于乳酸阈值的情况下情感最积极。在低于乳酸阈值和达到乳酸阈值的情况下个体差异最大。定性结果表明,与能力认知、运动强度解读、运动结果、注意力焦点和控制感相关的因素影响了情感反应,并导致了定量数据中显示的个体差异。