Portugal Eduardo M M, Lattari Eduardo, Santos Tony M, Deslandes Andrea C
1 Neuroscience Laboratory of Exercise, UFRJ, RJ, Brazil.
2 Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, IPUB/UFRJ, RJ, Brazil.
Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Oct;121(2):465-81. doi: 10.2466/29.PMS.121c17x3. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
This study was an evaluation of the effects of self-selected intensity and three prescribed intensities of strength exercises on affective responses. 16 healthy active male participants (M age = 25.1 yr., SD = 5.5; M height = 168.0 cm, SD = 31.8; M weight = 84.4 kg, SD = 8.6) were randomly assigned to a control condition without exercise (Control); three prescribed exercise intensities at 40% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), 60% 1RM, and 80% 1RM; and one self-selected intensity (Self-selected). Affective response was assessed by the Feeling Scale and the Felt Arousal Scale. All prescribed intensities showed increased activation and only the session at 80% 1RM showed reduction valence compared to the Control condition. Thus, the affective response to strength training does not seem to be influenced by exercise intensity.
本研究评估了自我选择强度和三种规定强度的力量训练对情感反应的影响。16名健康活跃的男性参与者（年龄M = 25.1岁，标准差 = 5.5；身高M = 168.0厘米，标准差 = 31.8；体重M = 84.4千克，标准差 = 8.6）被随机分配到无运动的对照条件（对照组）；三种规定的运动强度，分别为一次重复最大值（1RM）的40%、60%和80%；以及一种自我选择的强度（自我选择组）。情感反应通过感觉量表和感知唤醒量表进行评估。与对照条件相比，所有规定强度都显示出激活增加，只有80% 1RM的训练时段显示出效价降低。因此，力量训练的情感反应似乎不受运动强度的影响。
