Suppr超能文献

机动车碰撞后胸腰段交界处损伤:系安全带与未系安全带的前排乘客有无差异?

Thoracolumbar junction injuries after motor vehicle collision: are there differences in restrained and nonrestrained front seat occupants?

作者信息

Inamasu Joji, Guiot Bernard H

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida 33606, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Sep;7(3):311-4. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/09/311.

Abstract

OBJECT

Motor vehicle collision (MVC) is one of the most common causes of thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) injury. Although there is little doubt that the use of seat belts reduces the incidence and severity of TLJ injury after MVC, the mechanism by which this is protective against TLJ injury for drivers and passengers is relatively unknown.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with TLJ (T11-L2) injury who were front seat occupants of a four-wheeled vehicle at the time of MVC (frontal crash) were admitted between 2000 and 2004. The 39 patients were divided into two groups: 18 who had been restrained and 21 who had not been restrained at the time of the MVC. Patient demographics, including the mean Injury Severity Scale score, incidence of neurological deficit, level of TLJ injury, and type of TLJ injury according to the Denis classification were compared.

RESULTS

The incidence of neurological deficit in the restrained group was significantly lower compared with the nonrestrained group (5.6% compared with 33.3%, p < 0.05). The incidence of flexion-distraction/fracture-dislocation injuries in the restrained group was also significantly lower (0.0% compared with 33.3% in the nonrestrained group, p < 0.01). The restrained group was significantly older (37.4 +/- 3.6 years compared with 28.0 +/- 2.5 years in the nonrestrained group, p < 0.05), but otherwise there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the patients' demographic data.

CONCLUSIONS

It is likely that the high incidence of neurological deficit in the nonrestrained front seat motor vehicle occupants who had a TLJ injury was mostly due to the high incidence of flexion-distraction/fracture-dislocation injuries. This retrospective study indirectly shows the efficacy of three-point seat belt systems in reducing the severity of a TLJ injury after an MVC. Compression/burst fractures still occur in restrained front seat occupants, however, and elucidation of the injury mechanism of such axial loading fractures may be important to improve safety further for automobile occupants.

摘要

目的

机动车碰撞(MVC)是胸腰段交界处(TLJ)损伤最常见的原因之一。尽管安全带的使用无疑降低了MVC后TLJ损伤的发生率和严重程度,但这种保护驾驶员和乘客免受TLJ损伤的机制相对尚不明确。

方法

选取2000年至2004年间收治的39例TLJ(T11 - L2)损伤患者,这些患者在MVC(正面碰撞)发生时是四轮车辆的前排乘客。39例患者分为两组:18例在MVC发生时系了安全带,21例未系安全带。比较患者的人口统计学数据,包括平均损伤严重程度评分、神经功能缺损发生率、TLJ损伤水平以及根据Denis分类的TLJ损伤类型。

结果

系安全带组的神经功能缺损发生率显著低于未系安全带组(5.6% 对比33.3%,p < 0.05)。系安全带组的屈曲 - 牵张/骨折 - 脱位损伤发生率也显著更低(0.0% 对比未系安全带组的33.3%,p < 0.01)。系安全带组的患者年龄显著更大(37.4 ± 3.6岁对比未系安全带组的28.0 ± 2.5岁,p < 0.05),但除此之外,两组患者的人口统计学数据没有显著差异。

结论

TLJ损伤的未系安全带前排机动车乘客中神经功能缺损的高发生率很可能主要归因于屈曲 - 牵张/骨折 - 脱位损伤的高发生率。这项回顾性研究间接表明了三点式安全带系统在降低MVC后TLJ损伤严重程度方面的有效性。然而,系安全带的前排乘客仍会发生压缩/爆裂骨折,阐明此类轴向负荷骨折的损伤机制对于进一步提高汽车乘客的安全性可能很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验