Trauma Department and Accident Research Unit, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Accident Research Unit, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 May;66:15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
Spinal injuries pose a considerable risk to life and quality of life. In spite of improvements in active and passive safety of motor vehicles, car accidents are regarded as a major cause for vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current incidence of vertebral fractures among front-seat occupants in motor vehicle accidents, and to identify specific risk factors for sustaining vertebral fractures in motor vehicle accidents. Data from an accident research unit were accessed to collect collision details, preclinical data, and clinical data. We included all data on front-seat occupants. Hospital records were retrieved, and radiological images were evaluated. We analysed 33,015 front-seat occupants involved in motor vehicle accidents over a 24-year period. We identified 126 subjects (0.38%) with cervical spine fractures, 78 (0.24%) with thoracic fractures, and 99 (0.30%) with lumbar fractures. The mean relative collision speeds were 48, 39, and 40 kph in subjects with cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine fractures, respectively, while it was 17.3 kph in the whole cohort. Contrary to the overall cohort, these patients typically sustained multiple hits rather than simple front collisions. Occupants with vertebral fractures frequently showed numerous concomitant injuries; for example, additional vertebral fractures. The incidence of vertebral fractures corresponded with collision speed. Safety belts were highly effective in the prevention of vertebral fractures. Apart from high speed, complex injury mechanisms as multiple collisions or rollovers were associated with vertebral fractures. Additional preventive measures should focus on these collision mechanisms.
脊柱损伤对生命和生活质量构成重大威胁。尽管汽车的主动和被动安全性能有所提高,但车祸仍被认为是椎体骨折的主要原因。本研究旨在评估机动车事故中前排乘客的椎体骨折发生率,并确定机动车事故中发生椎体骨折的特定危险因素。
我们访问了一个事故研究单位,以收集碰撞细节、临床前数据和临床数据。我们纳入了所有前排乘客的数据。检索了医院记录,并评估了影像学图像。
我们分析了 24 年间涉及机动车事故的 33015 名前排乘客。我们确定了 126 名(0.38%)颈椎骨折、78 名(0.24%)胸椎骨折和 99 名(0.30%)腰椎骨折的受试者。颈椎、胸椎和腰椎骨折受试者的平均相对碰撞速度分别为 48、39 和 40 公里/小时,而整个队列的平均相对碰撞速度为 17.3 公里/小时。与整个队列相反,这些患者通常遭受多次撞击,而不是简单的正面碰撞。
椎体骨折患者常伴有多种伴随损伤;例如,额外的椎体骨折。椎体骨折的发生率与碰撞速度相对应。安全带在预防椎体骨折方面非常有效。除了速度高外,多碰撞或翻车等复杂的损伤机制也与椎体骨折有关。应将其他预防措施的重点放在这些碰撞机制上。