• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下两节段颈椎前路融合术对相邻上节段的影响。

Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level.

作者信息

Park Dong-Hyuk, Ramakrishnan Prem, Cho Tai-Hyoung, Lorenz Eric, Eck Jason C, Humphreys S Craig, Lim Tae-Hong

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Sep;7(3):336-40. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/09/336.

DOI:10.3171/SPI-07/09/336
PMID:17877270
Abstract

OBJECT

Symptomatic multisegment disease is most common at the C5-6 and C6-7 levels, and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is performed most often at these levels. Therefore, it may be clinically important to know whether a C5-7 fusion affects the superior C4-5 segment. A biomechanical study was carried out using cadaveric cervical spine specimens to determine the effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on intradiscal pressure and segmental motion at the superior adjacent vertebral level.

METHODS

Five cadaveric cervical spine specimens were used in this study. The specimens were stabilized at T-1 and loaded at C-3 to 15 degrees flexion, 10 degrees extension, and 10 degrees lateral bending before and after simulated two-level ACDF with plate placement at C5-7. Intradiscal pressure was recorded at the C4-5 level, and segmental motion was recorded from C-4 through C-7. Differences in mean intradiscal pressures were calculated and analyzed using a paired Student t-test. When the maximum calibrated intradiscal pressures were exceeded ("overshot") during measurements, data from the specimens involved were analyzed using the motion data with a Student t-test. Values for pressure and motion obtained before and after simulated ACDF were compared.

RESULTS

During flexion, the mean intradiscal pressure changes (+/- standard deviations) in the pre- and post-ACDF measurements were 1275 (+/- 225) mm Hg and 2475 (+/- 75) mm Hg, respectively (p < 0.05). When the results of pre-ACDF testing were compared with post-ACDF results, no significant difference was found in the mean changes in the intradiscal pressure during extension and lateral bending. The maximum calibrated intradiscal pressures were exceeded during the post-ACDF testing in four specimens in extension, three in flexion, and two in lateral bending. Comparison of pre- and post-ACDF data for all five specimens revealed significant differences in motion and intradiscal pressure (p < 0.05) during flexion, significant differences in motion (p < 0.05) but not in intradiscal pressure during extension, and significant differences in intradiscal pressure changes (p < 0.05) but not in motion during lateral bending.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulated C5-7 ACDF caused a significant increase in intradiscal pressure and segmental motion in the superior adjacent C4-5 level during physiological motion. The increased pressure and hypermobility might accelerate normal degenerative changes in the vertebral levels adjacent to the anterior cervical fusion.

摘要

目的

有症状的多节段疾病最常见于C5 - 6和C6 - 7节段,两级颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)最常在此节段进行。因此,了解C5 - 7融合是否会影响上方的C4 - 5节段可能具有临床重要性。本研究使用尸体颈椎标本进行生物力学研究,以确定下两级颈椎前路融合对相邻上位椎体节段椎间盘内压力和节段运动的影响。

方法

本研究使用了5个尸体颈椎标本。在T - 1处固定标本,并在C5 - 7节段模拟两级ACDF并放置钢板前后,在C - 3处加载,使其进行15度前屈、10度后伸和10度侧弯运动。记录C4 - 5节段的椎间盘内压力,并记录C - 4至C - 7节段的节段运动。使用配对学生t检验计算并分析平均椎间盘内压力的差异。当测量过程中超过最大校准椎间盘内压力(“超限”)时,对涉及的标本数据使用运动数据并通过学生t检验进行分析。比较模拟ACDF前后获得的压力和运动值。

结果

在前屈过程中,ACDF术前和术后测量的平均椎间盘内压力变化(±标准差)分别为1275(±225)mmHg和2475(±75)mmHg(p < 0.05)。将ACDF术前测试结果与术后结果进行比较时,后伸和侧弯过程中椎间盘内压力的平均变化未发现显著差异。在ACDF术后测试中,后伸时有4个标本、前屈时有3个标本、侧弯时有2个标本超过了最大校准椎间盘内压力。对所有5个标本的ACDF术前和术后数据进行比较发现,前屈过程中运动和椎间盘内压力存在显著差异(p < 0.05),后伸过程中运动存在显著差异(p < 0.05)但椎间盘内压力无显著差异,侧弯过程中椎间盘内压力变化存在显著差异(p < 0.05)但运动无显著差异。

结论

模拟C5 - 7 ACDF在生理运动过程中导致相邻上位C4 - 5节段的椎间盘内压力和节段运动显著增加。压力增加和活动过度可能会加速颈椎前路融合相邻椎体节段的正常退变。

相似文献

1
Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level.下两节段颈椎前路融合术对相邻上节段的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Sep;7(3):336-40. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/09/336.
2
Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.零切迹杂交融合构建与 2 节段钢板固定治疗颈椎相邻节段疾病。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Nov;21(5):753-60. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE131059. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
3
Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.颈椎融合对相邻节段椎间盘内压力及节段运动影响的生物力学研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2431-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003.
4
Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion.单节段与多节段颈椎融合术后邻近节段的生物力学
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Feb;16(2):172-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.10.SPINE11116. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.一种低轮廓、锚固式颈椎椎间融合器装置在索引节段或与钢板融合相邻节段的生物力学评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):E763-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000344.
6
[Biomechanical study on the effect of the length of cervical anterior fusion on adjacent levels].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;52(9):692-6.
7
Kinetic analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion supplemented with transarticular facet screws.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术联合经关节突关节螺钉固定的动力学分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 May;20(5):485-91. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13837. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
8
Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis.使用零轮廓装置或椎间融合器加钢板进行单节段或双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段的生物力学变化:有限元分析
Comput Biol Med. 2020 May;120:103760. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103760. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
9
Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.模拟两级颈椎手术(融合术和置换术)及混合手术后椎间盘压力和小关节接触力的生物力学分析。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6):1388-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
10
Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.单节段或双节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术后邻近节段退变的生物力学评估:有限元分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Jun;189:105352. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105352. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Contiguous versus skip discectomy and fusion in cervical disc herniation: Do we need to fuse the normal intermediate segment?颈椎间盘突出症中连续与跳跃式椎间盘切除术及融合术:我们是否需要融合正常的中间节段?
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025 Apr-Jun;16(2):243-249. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_28_25. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
2
Preoperative Spino Cranial Angle Predicts Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.术前棘突颅骨角可预测单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段退变
Orthop Res Rev. 2025 Jul 28;17:361-371. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S533548. eCollection 2025.
3
Development and validation of a predictive model for the risk of symptomatic adjacent segmental degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后症状性相邻节段退变风险预测模型的开发与验证
Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 17;16:1530257. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1530257. eCollection 2025.
4
Complications and reoperations in young versus old patients undergoing cervical disc arthroplasty.年轻与老年患者颈椎间盘置换术的并发症及再次手术情况
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jan 21;21:100589. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100589. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
The efficacy of anchored stand-alone spacers in comparison to conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for clinical and radiological outcomes.在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合手术中,与传统椎间融合器和钢板相比,锚定独立间隔物的疗效:对临床和影像学结果的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Brain Spine. 2024 Jan 18;4:102748. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102748. eCollection 2024.
6
Radiographic Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后相邻节段疾病的影像学危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Global Spine J. 2024 Sep;14(7):2183-2200. doi: 10.1177/21925682241237500. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.零切迹锚定 cage 与传统 cage-板固定在单节段颈前路椎间盘切除融合术中的临床和影像学比较。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Sep 30;27(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00813-w.
8
Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year.颈椎关节置换术与颈椎前路融合术的疗效比较:一项至少 7 年随访的随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):1875-1884. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03365-1. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
9
Segmental Motion of Cervical Arthroplasty Leads to Decreased Adjacent-Level Degeneration: Analysis of the 7-Year Postoperative Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.颈椎人工关节置换的节段性运动可减少相邻节段退变:一项多中心随机对照试验的7年术后结果分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):186-193. doi: 10.14444/8187. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
10
Comparison of Radiographic Reconstruction and Clinical Improvement between Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.人工颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后影像学重建与临床改善的比较。
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Jan 24;2022:3353810. doi: 10.1155/2022/3353810. eCollection 2022.