Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Feb;16(2):172-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.10.SPINE11116. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with spinal fusion are at greater risk for adjacent-segment disease and require additional surgery. It has been postulated that excessive motion of a given motion segment unit (MSU) leads to an increased risk of disc degeneration. It is the authors' hypothesis that a greater increase in adjacent-segment motion will be observed following a 2-level versus a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and instrumented fusion (ACDF). Therefore, they undertook this study to determine the effect of single-level versus 2-level ACDF on the biomechanics of adjacent MSUs.
Ten fresh-frozen human cervical spines were used in this study. The specimens were potted at C-4 and T-1 and tested in flexion and extension. Range of motion (ROM) was 30° of flexion and 15° of extension at a maximum load of 50 N. The specimens were tested intact and then were randomized into 2 groups of 5 specimens each. Group 1 underwent a single-level ACDF at the C5-6 level first, and Group 2 underwent the procedure at the C6-7 level. After testing, both groups had the fusion extended to include the C5-7 levels, and the testing was repeated. Changes in overall ROM, stiffness, and segmental motion were calculated and statistically analyzed using a paired Student t-test.
An increase in sagittal ROM of 31.30% above (p = 0.012) and 33.88% below (p = 0.066) the fused MSU was found comparing a 2-level with a 1-level ACDF. The overall stiffness of the entire spinal construct increased 37.34% (p = 0.051) in extension and 30.59% (p = 0.013) in flexion as the second fusion level was added. As expected, the overall sagittal ROM of the entire spinal construct decreased by 13.68% (p = 0.0014) with a 2-level compared with a 1-level fusion.
This study has shown that the biomechanics at adjacent levels to a cervical spine fusion are altered and that there is increased adjacent-segment motion at the levels above and below, after a 2-level compared with a 1-level ACDF.
先前的研究表明,脊柱融合患者发生邻近节段疾病的风险更高,需要进行额外的手术。有人推测,特定运动节段单位(MSU)的过度运动导致椎间盘退变的风险增加。作者假设,与单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)相比,双节段 ACDF 后相邻节段的运动增加会更大。因此,他们进行了这项研究,以确定单节段与双节段 ACDF 对相邻 MSU 生物力学的影响。
本研究使用了 10 个新鲜冷冻的人颈椎标本。标本在 C-4 和 T-1 处进行盆栽,并在屈伸位进行测试。最大载荷为 50N 时,运动范围(ROM)为 30°屈曲和 15°伸展。标本完整测试后,随机分为两组,每组 5 个标本。第 1 组首先在 C5-6 水平行单节段 ACDF,第 2 组在 C6-7 水平行该手术。测试后,两组均将融合范围扩大至 C5-7 水平,并重复测试。使用配对学生 t 检验计算和统计分析整体 ROM、刚度和节段运动的变化。
与单节段 ACDF 相比,双节段 ACDF 使融合 MSU 上方矢状面 ROM 增加 31.30%(p = 0.012),下方增加 33.88%(p = 0.066)。在伸展时,整个脊柱结构的整体刚度增加了 37.34%(p = 0.051),在屈曲时增加了 30.59%(p = 0.013),因为增加了第二个融合水平。正如预期的那样,与单节段融合相比,双节段融合使整个脊柱结构的整体矢状面 ROM 减少了 13.68%(p = 0.0014)。
本研究表明,颈椎融合后相邻节段的生物力学发生了改变,与单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术相比,双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后,相邻节段的运动增加。