• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前棘突颅骨角可预测单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段退变

Preoperative Spino Cranial Angle Predicts Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

作者信息

Li Yong, Cheng Peiyan, Zhang Xiaolei, Cheng Cai

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, 061000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Orthop Res Rev. 2025 Jul 28;17:361-371. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S533548. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/ORR.S533548
PMID:40755467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12316177/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is a common complication after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). The spino cranial angle (SCA), a novel sagittal parameter reflecting head-to-cervical alignment, may be associated with ASD, yet its predictive value remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients who underwent single-level ACDF with at least 24 months of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic evaluations were conducted preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients were classified into ASD and non-ASD groups based on established radiographic criteria. Pre- and postoperative cervical sagittal parameters, including SCA, T1 slope (T1s), sagittal segmental alignment (SSA), sagittal alignment of the cervical spine (SACS), and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) were measured. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. Multivariate logistic regression and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify independent predictors of ASD.

RESULTS

ASD occurred in 36 patients (36.7%). Preoperative SCA was significantly larger in the ASD group compared to the non-ASD group (86.7° ± 7.4° vs 80.5° ± 6.9°, p < 0.001), while T1s and SSA were significantly smaller (p = 0.015 and p = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative SCA as the only independent risk factor for ASD (OR = 1.279, 95% CI: 1.010-1.619, p = 0.041). Patients with SCA > 84.2° showed a significantly higher incidence of ASD (55.8% vs 21.4%, p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated that SCA had good predictive value for ASD development. No significant differences were observed in JOA, NDI, or VAS scores between the two groups at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative SCA is a significant predictor of ASD, and may be considered in preoperative risk assessment.

摘要

背景

相邻节段退变(ASD)是颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)后常见的并发症。脊柱颅角(SCA)是一种反映头部与颈椎对线关系的新型矢状面参数,可能与ASD有关,但其预测价值尚不清楚。

方法

回顾性分析98例行单节段ACDF且随访至少24个月的患者。术前及术后3、6、12和24个月进行影像学评估。根据既定的影像学标准将患者分为ASD组和非ASD组。测量术前及术后颈椎矢状面参数,包括SCA、T1斜率(T1s)、矢状节段对线(SSA)、颈椎矢状对线(SACS)和C2-C7矢状垂直轴(cSVA)。使用日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估临床结局。进行多因素逻辑回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定ASD的独立预测因素。

结果

36例患者(36.7%)发生ASD。与非ASD组相比,ASD组术前SCA显著更大(86.7°±7.4° vs 80.5°±6.9°,p<0.001),而T1s和SSA显著更小(分别为p = 0.015和p = 0.001)。多因素分析确定术前SCA是ASD的唯一独立危险因素(OR = 1.279,95%CI:1.010-1.619,p = 0.041)。SCA>84.2°的患者ASD发生率显著更高(55.8% vs 21.4%,p<0.001)。ROC分析表明SCA对ASD的发生具有良好的预测价值。末次随访时两组间JOA、NDI或VAS评分无显著差异。

结论

术前SCA是ASD的重要预测指标,可在术前风险评估中予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Preoperative Spino Cranial Angle Predicts Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.术前棘突颅骨角可预测单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段退变
Orthop Res Rev. 2025 Jul 28;17:361-371. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S533548. eCollection 2025.
2
Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颈椎间盘置换术后邻近节段的运动学:与前路椎间盘切除融合术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S85-95. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d6628.
3
[Application of V-shaped stealth decompression technique using ultrasonic bone scalpel in anterior surgery for adjacent two-level cervical spondylosis].超声骨刀V形潜行减压技术在相邻两节段颈椎病前路手术中的应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 15;39(6):741-747. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202502056.
4
Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.颈椎矢状面平衡分析中哪些参数是相关的?一项文献综述。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Feb;27(Suppl 1):8-15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5462-y. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
5
What is the Early Fate of the Adjacent Segmental Angles Following a Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion for Degenerative Pathology?对于退行性病变,单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段角度的早期转归如何?
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001836.
6
Changes in the Centers of Rotation in Different Prosthetic Segments Following Continuous Two-Level Cervical Disc Replacement: A Retrospective Study.连续双节段颈椎间盘置换术后不同假体节段旋转中心的变化:一项回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;192:e416-e422. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.110. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
7
Morphological, functional and neurological outcomes of craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling for isolated nonsyndromic synostosis of the sagittal suture: a systematic review.颅骨切除术与颅骨重塑术治疗孤立性非综合征性矢状缝早闭的形态学、功能及神经学预后:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep;13(9):309-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2470.
8
Effect of device constraint: a comparative network meta-analysis of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty.器械限制的影响:ACDF 与颈椎间盘置换的比较网络荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2024 Oct;24(10):1858-1871. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.016. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
9
Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Optimal Treatment Approaches of Degenerative Cervical Spondylosis: A 12-Year Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.退行性颈椎病的长期临床结局及最佳治疗方法:一项为期12年的多中心回顾性队列研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jul 1;50(13):890-901. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005266. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
10
Does Periacetabular Osteotomy Change Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment?髋臼周围截骨术是否改变矢状位脊柱骨盆排列?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1659-1667. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003031. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the most accurate substitute for an invisible T1 slope in cervical radiographs? A comparative study of a novel method with previously reported substitutes.颈椎X线片中,什么是对不可见T1斜率最准确的替代指标?一种新方法与先前报道的替代指标的比较研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Nov 26;36(5):815-821. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21901. Print 2022 May 1.
2
Spino cranial angle as a predictor of loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy.颅底夹角预测颈椎脊髓病患者行颈椎板成形术后颈椎前凸丢失。
BMC Surg. 2021 Jun 12;21(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01293-1.
3
Can C7 Slope Substitute the T1 Slope in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients? A Radiographic Study.
特发性脊柱侧弯患者 C7 斜率能否替代 T1 斜率?一项影像学研究。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jul 1;41(6):e374-e379. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001807.
4
Assessment of spino cranial angle of cervical spine sagittal balance system after multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.评估颈椎多节段前路椎间盘切除融合术后脊柱颅面角与颈椎矢状位平衡系统的相关性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 17;16(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02353-1.
5
Influence of SCA on clinical outcomes and cervical alignment after laminoplasty in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者后纵韧带骨化症对颈椎管扩大术后临床疗效及颈椎曲度的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02200-3.
6
Sagittal balance of the spine.脊柱矢状面平衡。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):1889-1905. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
7
Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.颈椎矢状面平衡分析中哪些参数是相关的?一项文献综述。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Feb;27(Suppl 1):8-15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5462-y. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
8
Prognostic Value of Lordosis Decrease in Radiographic Adjacent Segment Pathology After Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion.颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术后影像学邻近节段病变中腰椎前凸减少的预后价值。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 31;7(1):14414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14300-4.
9
Can C7 Slope Substitute the T1 slope?: An Analysis Using Cervical Radiographs and Kinematic MRIs.C7 斜率能否替代 T1 斜率?:颈椎 X 线片和运动学 MRI 的分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Apr 1;43(7):520-525. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002371.
10
MRI to measure cervical sagittal parameters: a comparison with plain radiographs.磁共振成像测量颈椎矢状面参数:与X线平片的比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Apr;137(4):451-455. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2639-5. Epub 2017 Feb 8.