• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过佩什金的“我”来探索研究指导:黄砖路。

Exploring research supervision through Peshkin's I's: the yellow brick road.

作者信息

Bradbury-Jones Caroline

机构信息

School of Healthcare Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, UK.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2007 Oct;60(2):220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04381.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04381.x
PMID:17877569
Abstract

AIM

This paper is a report of a systematic approach used to explore subjectivity as a research student and demonstrates how the process enhanced the quality of the research experience.

BACKGROUND

High non-completion rates of research students are of global concern and means of enhancing the quality of the doctoral experience are needed. Among the literature on doctoral education, very little is authored by students. This paper is influenced by the work of Peshkin from the discipline of education. Peshkin articulated the need for researchers to systematically identify their subjectivity by searching for their subjective I's. I share my experience of adopting this approach as a research student by using reflexive journal entries made during 2005-2007 as data.

FINDINGS

I use the analogy of the 'Yellow Brick Road' from The Wizard of Oz to represent my experience of being a doctoral student and draw comparisons between my subjectivity and the characters in the story. I demonstrate how a systematic approach to exploring my subjectivity revealed aspects of my being as a research student that had potential for influence throughout the entirety of my experience. I argue that cognizance of my subjective I's improved the quality of my research endeavour.

CONCLUSION

The approach is offered for consideration by other research students as a means of exploring subjectivity. I argue that the resultant self-awareness can enhance the quality of the doctoral experience. The flexibility of the approach means it has transferability across a number of disciplines and cultural contexts.

摘要

目的

本文报告了一种用于探索作为研究生的主体性的系统方法,并展示了该过程如何提升研究体验的质量。

背景

研究生的高辍学率是全球关注的问题,因此需要提高博士学习体验质量的方法。在关于博士教育的文献中,由学生撰写的非常少。本文受到教育学科领域佩什金著作的影响。佩什金明确指出研究人员需要通过寻找主观的“我”来系统地识别自己的主体性。我以2005年至2007年期间所写的反思性日志条目作为数据,分享我作为研究生采用这种方法的经历。

研究结果

我用《绿野仙踪》中“黄砖路”的比喻来代表我作为博士生的经历,并将我的主体性与故事中的角色进行比较。我展示了一种探索我主体性的系统方法如何揭示了我作为研究生的存在中那些在整个经历中可能产生影响的方面。我认为,认识到我的主观“我”提高了我的研究工作质量。

结论

该方法可供其他研究生考虑,作为一种探索主体性的方式。我认为由此产生的自我意识可以提高博士学习体验的质量。该方法的灵活性意味着它可以在多个学科和文化背景中应用。

相似文献

1
Exploring research supervision through Peshkin's I's: the yellow brick road.通过佩什金的“我”来探索研究指导:黄砖路。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Oct;60(2):220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04381.x.
2
Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's I's.加强定性健康研究的严谨性:通过佩什金的“我”来探索主观性。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Aug;59(3):290-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04306.x. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
3
A new way of reflecting in nursing: the Peshkin Approach.一种新的护理反思方法:佩什金方法。
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Nov;65(11):2485-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05144.x.
4
Making research supervision work for you.让研究指导为你所用。
Nurse Res. 2010;17(2):44-51. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.01.17.2.44.c7461.
5
RN as gatekeeper: gatekeeping as monitoring and supervision.注册护士作为把关者:把关即监测与监督。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jul;17(14):1868-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02376.x.
6
Multidisciplinarity in nursing research: a challenge for today's doctoral student.护理研究中的多学科性:当今博士生面临的一项挑战。
Can J Nurs Res. 2002 Dec;34(4):129-37.
7
Doctoral graduates in mental health nursing in Victoria, Australia: the doctoral experience and contribution to scholarship.澳大利亚维多利亚州精神卫生护理领域的博士毕业生:博士经历及对学术研究的贡献
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(4):270-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00543.x.
8
A student's perspective of managing data collection in a complex qualitative study.一名学生对复杂定性研究中数据收集管理的看法。
Nurse Res. 2014 Nov;22(2):34-9. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.2.34.e1302.
9
An evaluation of fitness for practice curricula: self-efficacy, support and self-reported competence in preregistration student nurses and midwives.对实践能力课程的评估:预注册护士和助产士学生的自我效能感、支持与自我报告的能力
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jul;17(14):1858-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02223.x.
10
Q-methodology in nursing research: a promising method for the study of subjectivity.护理研究中的Q方法:一种研究主观性的有前景的方法。
West J Nurs Res. 2008 Oct;30(6):759-73. doi: 10.1177/0193945907312979. Epub 2008 Mar 12.