• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FIM+FAM在评估创伤性脑损伤日间项目结果中的效用。

The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.

作者信息

Seel Ronald T, Wright Greg, Wallace Tracey, Newman Sary, Dennis Leanne

机构信息

Crawford Research Institute, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA.

出版信息

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):267-77. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000290971.56130.c8.

DOI:10.1097/01.HTR.0000290971.56130.c8
PMID:17878768
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of the FIM+FAM as a primary outcome measure for traumatic brain injury (TBI) comprehensive day programs.

DESIGN

Retrospective data analysis.

SETTING

Single center, TBI comprehensive day program facility.

PARTICIPANTS

A demographically and regionally diverse sample of 105 persons with moderate or severe TBI admitted to the Shepherd Pathways comprehensive TBI day rehabilitation program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Functional Independence Measure + Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight percent or fewer of participants reached ceiling effects on 25 of the 30 FIM+FAM items at day program admission with only 2% of clients rated above ceiling score levels on the FIM+FAM total score. The criteria of Guyatt et al showed that 20 of the 30 FIM+FAM items showed clinically meaningful improvements in 60% or more of clients. On average, clients with TBI improved over 27 points on the FIM+FAM total score. Fifteen of 30 items showed ceiling effects of 33% or less at discharge where only 25% of clients exceeded the FIM+FAM total score ceiling threshold. Discharge FIM+FAM motor scale was a very good predictor of the need for additional single service physical therapy. However, reaching ceiling rating on the FIM+FAM cognitive scale demonstrated poor specificity (0.28) and negative predictive power (0.42) for the need for additional speech/cognitive therapy services.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIM+FAM demonstrated utility as an outcome measure for TBI comprehensive day program treatment in the current milieu. Future research is required to replicate and extend the current findings.

摘要

目的

评估功能独立性测量量表加功能评估量表(FIM+FAM)作为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)综合日间项目主要结局指标的有效性。

设计

回顾性数据分析。

地点

单中心TBI综合日间项目机构。

参与者

105名中重度TBI患者组成的人口统计学和地域分布多样的样本,这些患者入住谢泼德康复路径TBI综合日间康复项目。

主要结局指标

功能独立性测量量表+功能评估量表(FIM+FAM)。

结果

在日间项目入院时,30项FIM+FAM条目中有25项的参与者达到上限效应的比例为28%或更低,FIM+FAM总分高于上限分数水平的患者仅占2%。盖亚特等人的标准显示,30项FIM+FAM条目中有20项在60%或更多患者中显示出具有临床意义的改善。平均而言,TBI患者的FIM+FAM总分提高了27分以上。30项条目中有15项在出院时的上限效应为33%或更低,只有25%的患者超过了FIM+FAM总分上限阈值。出院时FIM+FAM运动量表是预测是否需要额外单项物理治疗服务的良好指标。然而,在FIM+FAM认知量表上达到上限评分对于是否需要额外言语/认知治疗服务的特异性较差(0.28),阴性预测能力也较差(0.42)。

结论

在当前环境下,FIM+FAM作为TBI综合日间项目治疗的结局指标具有实用性。需要未来的研究来重复和扩展当前的研究结果。

相似文献

1
The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.FIM+FAM在评估创伤性脑损伤日间项目结果中的效用。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):267-77. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000290971.56130.c8.
2
Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.评估用于社区个体长期随访的创伤性脑损伤结局指标。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Mar;82(3):367-74. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.21525.
3
Rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury in active duty military personnel and veterans: Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center randomized controlled trial of two rehabilitation approaches.现役军人和退伍军人创伤性脑损伤的康复:国防与退伍军人脑损伤中心对两种康复方法的随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Dec;89(12):2227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.015.
4
Preliminary outcome analysis of a long-term rehabilitation program for severe acquired brain injury.重度获得性脑损伤长期康复计划的初步结果分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Nov;81(11):1447-56. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.16343.
5
The functional assessment measure (FAM) in closed traumatic brain injury outpatients: a Rasch-based psychometric study.闭合性创伤性脑损伤门诊患者的功能评估量表(FAM):一项基于拉施模型的心理测量学研究。
J Outcome Meas. 1998;2(2):79-96.
6
A follow-up study of older adults with traumatic brain injury: taking into account decreasing length of stay.对老年创伤性脑损伤患者的随访研究:考虑住院时间的缩短
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.309.
7
The predictive validity of a brief inpatient neuropsychologic battery for persons with traumatic brain injury.简短住院神经心理成套测验对创伤性脑损伤患者的预测效度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):950-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.011.
8
Validity and responsiveness of the care and needs scale for assessing support needs after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后评估支持需求的护理和需求量表的有效性和反应性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;91(6):905-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.033.
9
Time to rehabilitation admission and associated outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的康复入院时间及相关结局
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Dec;87(12):1590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.09.001.
10
The relationship of Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Score to rehabilitative potential in patients suffering traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的损伤严重程度评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分与康复潜力的关系。
Am Surg. 2003 Jun;69(6):491-7; discussion 497-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Skill-learning by observation-training with patients after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后对患者进行观察训练的技能学习
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 31;16:940075. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.940075. eCollection 2022.
2
Retrospective Analysis of Functional and Tracheostomy (Decannulation) Outcomes in Patients with Brain Injury in a Hyperacute Rehabilitation Unit.超急性康复单元中脑损伤患者功能及气管造口术(拔管)结局的回顾性分析
J Rehabil Med Clin Commun. 2019 Dec 19;2:1000024. doi: 10.2340/20030711-1000024. eCollection 2019.
3
Regional Variations in Rehabilitation Outcomes of Adult Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Investigation.
成人创伤性脑损伤患者康复结局的区域差异:医疗康复研究的统一数据系统。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jan;102(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
Atypical Within-Session Motor Procedural Learning after Traumatic Brain Injury but Well-Preserved Between-Session Procedural Memory Consolidation.创伤性脑损伤后会话内非典型运动程序性学习,但会话间程序性记忆巩固保存良好。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jan 30;12:10. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00010. eCollection 2018.
5
The Safety Assessment Measure for persons with traumatic brain injury: Item pool development and content validity.创伤性脑损伤患者安全评估量表:条目池开发与内容效度
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 30;39(3):371-87. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161369.
6
Vagus nerve stimulation to augment recovery from severe traumatic brain injury impeding consciousness: a prospective pilot clinical trial.迷走神经刺激促进严重创伤性脑损伤所致意识障碍的恢复:一项前瞻性试点临床试验。
Neurol Res. 2013 Apr;35(3):263-76. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000167.
7
A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM.英国 FIM + FAM 的综合心理测量评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(22):1885-95. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.766271. Epub 2013 Feb 5.