• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人创伤性脑损伤患者康复结局的区域差异:医疗康复研究的统一数据系统。

Regional Variations in Rehabilitation Outcomes of Adult Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Investigation.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jan;102(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2020.07.011
PMID:32861669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9284411/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine regional differences in rehabilitation outcomes among adult patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) who received care at an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).

DESIGN

We conducted a secondary analysis of a large, multi-center dataset from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation.

SETTING

More than 70% of all IRFs in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult TBI patients (N=175,358) aged 18 years or older who were admitted and discharged from an IRF in the United States between 2004 and 2014. Qualifying etiology included traumatic brain dysfunction Impairment Group codes 02.21 (traumatic, open injury) and 02.22 (traumatic, closed injury).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Discharge functional status (total, cognitive, motor), length of stay, and discharge to home.

RESULTS

Patient and clinical characteristics varied significantly by geographic location, as did median functional status, length of stay, and percentage of patients discharged home. The region where IRF care was received, race and ethnicity, age, occurrence of 1 or more falls during the IRF stay, case mix group, and insurance status were associated with discharge functional status, length of stay, and discharge to home.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide evidence of geographic differences in outcomes and potential disparities in care of TBI patients who received IRF care. More research is needed to identify TBI patients at risk for poor discharge outcomes to inform development and testing of interventions to reduce disparities in outcomes for these patients.

摘要

目的

研究在接受住院康复治疗(IRF)的中度至重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)成年患者中,康复结果的区域差异。

设计

我们对来自统一医疗康复数据系统的大型多中心数据集进行了二次分析。

设置

美国超过 70%的所有 IRF。

参与者

年龄在 18 岁或以上的成年 TBI 患者(N=175358),他们在美国的 IRF 住院和出院时间在 2004 年至 2014 年之间。合格的病因包括创伤性脑功能障碍损伤组代码 02.21(创伤性、开放性损伤)和 02.22(创伤性、闭合性损伤)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

出院功能状态(总体、认知、运动)、住院时间和出院回家。

结果

患者和临床特征因地理位置而异,功能状态中位数、住院时间和出院回家的患者比例也存在差异。IRF 治疗所在地、种族和民族、年龄、IRF 住院期间发生 1 次或多次跌倒、病例组合组和保险状况与出院功能状态、住院时间和出院回家相关。

结论

我们的发现提供了证据表明,接受 IRF 治疗的 TBI 患者的结果存在地域差异,并且在护理方面可能存在差异。需要进一步研究以确定 TBI 患者出院结果不良的风险,为这些患者的结果差异减少干预措施的制定和测试提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/9284411/c8ca9453d248/nihms-1805121-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/9284411/28eab906613a/nihms-1805121-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/9284411/d46beaa35a21/nihms-1805121-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/9284411/c8ca9453d248/nihms-1805121-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/9284411/28eab906613a/nihms-1805121-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/9284411/d46beaa35a21/nihms-1805121-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/9284411/c8ca9453d248/nihms-1805121-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Regional Variations in Rehabilitation Outcomes of Adult Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Investigation.成人创伤性脑损伤患者康复结局的区域差异:医疗康复研究的统一数据系统。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jan;102(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
Change in inpatient rehabilitation admissions for individuals with traumatic brain injury after implementation of the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system.医疗保险住院康复设施按项目付费制实施后创伤性脑损伤患者住院康复入院人数的变化。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8):1305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.030.
3
Trends in the Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Medicare Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Treated in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities: 2013 to 2018.2013 年至 2018 年老年 Medicare 创伤性脑损伤患者在住院康复医疗机构中的特征和结局变化趋势。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jun;105(6):1058-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.02.716. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
Predictors of cognitive gains during inpatient rehabilitation for older adults with traumatic brain injury.预测老年人创伤性脑损伤住院康复期间认知能力的提高。
PM R. 2023 Mar;15(3):265-277. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12795. Epub 2022 May 5.
5
Regional variation in stroke rehabilitation outcomes.脑卒中康复结局的区域性差异。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.018. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
6
Influence of sex and age on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes among older adults with traumatic brain injury.性别和年龄对老年创伤性脑损伤患者住院康复结局的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jan;91(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.017.
7
Variations in Inpatient Rehabilitation Functional Outcomes Across Centers in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study and the Influence of Demographics and Injury Severity on Patient Outcomes.创伤性脑损伤模型系统研究中各中心住院康复功能结局的差异以及人口统计学和损伤严重程度对患者结局的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Nov;97(11):1821-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 28.
8
Changes in Patient Demographics and Outcomes in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Traumatic Brain Injury Population from 2002 to 2016: Implications for Patient Care and Clinical Trials.2002 年至 2016 年住院康复设施创伤性脑损伤患者人群中的患者人口统计学和结局变化:对患者护理和临床试验的影响。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Sep 1;36(17):2513-2520. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6014. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
Centering race/ethnicity: Differences in traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation outcomes.关注种族/民族:创伤性脑损伤住院康复结局的差异。
PM R. 2022 Dec;14(12):1430-1438. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12737. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
Data Mining to Understand How Health Status Preceding Traumatic Brain Injury Affects Functional Outcome: A Population-Based Sex-Stratified Study.数据挖掘以了解创伤性脑损伤前的健康状况如何影响功能预后:一项基于人群的性别分层研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Sep;101(9):1523-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Setting the foundation for a national collaborative learning health system in acute TBI rehabilitation: CARE4TBI Year 1 experience.为急性创伤性脑损伤康复领域的全国协作学习健康系统奠定基础:CARE4TBI项目第一年的经验。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Dec 16;9(2):e10454. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10454. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Factors Associated With Rehabilitation Length of Stay in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.创伤性脑损伤患者康复住院时间的相关因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Brain Neurorehabil. 2025 Feb 24;18(1):e3. doi: 10.12786/bn.2025.18.e3. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Efficacy of BETTER transitional care intervention for diverse patients with traumatic brain injury and their families: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Traumatic brain injury resiliency model: a conceptual model to guide rehabilitation research and practice.创伤性脑损伤恢复力模型:指导康复研究与实践的概念模型。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Nov;41(22):2708-2717. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1474495. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Interventions That Support or Involve Caregivers or Families of Patients with Traumatic Injury: a Systematic Review.支持或涉及创伤性损伤患者的照顾者或家庭的干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1177-1186. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4417-7. Epub 2018 May 7.
3
A Factor Analysis of Functional Independence and Functional Assessment Measure Scores Among Focal and Diffuse Brain Injury Patients: The Importance of Bifactor Models.
BETTER 过渡性护理干预对不同创伤性脑损伤患者及其家庭的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0296083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296083. eCollection 2024.
4
Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcome Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods.使用机器学习方法预测创伤性脑损伤的康复结果
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023 Oct 2;5(4):100295. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100295. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury Using Bio-Clinical Markers at Presentation to the Emergency Department.使用急诊科就诊时的生物临床标志物,通过机器学习方法预测创伤性脑损伤患者的院内死亡率
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 5;13(15):2605. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152605.
6
The BETTER Traumatic Brain Injury Transitional Care Intervention: A Feasibility Study.BETTER 创伤性脑损伤过渡性护理干预:一项可行性研究。
West J Nurs Res. 2023 Oct;45(10):902-912. doi: 10.1177/01939459231189786. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
7
Post-Acute Care for Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in Taiwan.台湾创伤性脑损伤患者的急性后期护理
Int J Gen Med. 2023 May 4;16:1653-1659. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S407532. eCollection 2023.
8
"If you respect me, you are respecting my culture": methods and recommendations for personalizing a TBI transitional care intervention.“如果你尊重我,你就是在尊重我的文化”:个性化 TBI 过渡性护理干预的方法和建议。
Brain Inj. 2023 Jul 3;37(8):746-757. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2208881. Epub 2023 May 5.
9
Prognostic humility and ethical dilemmas after severe brain injury: Summary, recommendations, and qualitative analysis of Curing Coma Campaign virtual event proceedings.严重脑损伤后的预后谦逊与伦理困境:治愈昏迷运动虚拟活动记录的总结、建议及定性分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Mar 31;17:1128656. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1128656. eCollection 2023.
10
Prediction of motor function in patients with traumatic brain injury using genetic algorithms modified back propagation neural network: A data-based study.基于遗传算法改进的反向传播神经网络预测创伤性脑损伤患者的运动功能:一项基于数据的研究。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 19;16:1031712. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1031712. eCollection 2022.
功能独立性和功能评估测量评分在局灶性和弥漫性脑损伤患者中的因子分析:双因子模型的重要性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1805-1810. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Management of traumatic brain injury patients.创伤性脑损伤患者的管理
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb;71(1):12-21. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.12. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Quality of the Development of Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review.创伤性脑损伤临床实践指南的制定质量:一项系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 1;11(9):e0161554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161554. eCollection 2016.
6
The Safety Assessment Measure for persons with traumatic brain injury: Item pool development and content validity.创伤性脑损伤患者安全评估量表:条目池开发与内容效度
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 30;39(3):371-87. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161369.
7
Unintentional injuries after TBI: Potential risk factors, impacts, and prevention.创伤性脑损伤后的意外伤害:潜在风险因素、影响及预防
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 30;39(3):363-70. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161368.
8
Risk Factors for Institutionalization After Traumatic Brain Injury Inpatient Rehabilitation.创伤性脑损伤住院康复后机构化的风险因素。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017 May-Jun;32(3):158-167. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000246.
9
Multiple Imputation by Fully Conditional Specification for Dealing with Missing Data in a Large Epidemiologic Study.在大型流行病学研究中采用全条件设定多重填补法处理缺失数据
Int J Stat Med Res. 2015;4(3):287-295. doi: 10.6000/1929-6029.2015.04.03.7. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
10
Variations in Inpatient Rehabilitation Functional Outcomes Across Centers in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study and the Influence of Demographics and Injury Severity on Patient Outcomes.创伤性脑损伤模型系统研究中各中心住院康复功能结局的差异以及人口统计学和损伤严重程度对患者结局的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Nov;97(11):1821-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 28.