Stich Christine, Knäuper Bärbel, Eisermann Jens, Leder Helmut
Freie Universität Berlin.
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Jun;104(3 Pt 2):1139-68. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.4.1139-1168.
This research addresses whether one underlying concept of appreciation exists across different classes of objects. Three studies were done. To identify aesthetic properties relevant for the aesthetic judgment of everyday objects and paintings, in Study 1 expert interviews were conducted with 12 interior designers, object-oriented designers and architects, and 12 students of art history. In Study 2, multidimensional unfolding (MDU) was used to examine whether common judgment criteria can be identified for the objects of the different classes. A sample of 217 German subjects participated. 2- or 3-dimensional MDU solutions resulted for each object class. The identified dimensions were labeled using the aesthetic properties derived from the expert interviews (Study 1). These dimensions represent relevant dimensions of aesthetic judgment on which object properties vary. Study 2 suggested that people use different dimensions of aesthetic judgment for different object classes. The identified dimensions were then used to construct three sets of systematically varied everyday objects and one set of systematically varied paintings. Using this stimulus material in Study 3, conjoint analysis indicated these dimensions are differentially important for the overall aesthetic judgment.
本研究探讨了是否存在一种适用于不同类别物品的潜在欣赏概念。研究共进行了三项。为了确定与日常物品和绘画审美判断相关的美学属性，在研究1中，对12名室内设计师、产品设计师和建筑师以及12名艺术史专业学生进行了专家访谈。在研究2中，采用多维展开法（MDU）来检验是否能够为不同类别的物品确定共同的判断标准。217名德国受试者参与了此次研究。针对每个物品类别得出了二维或三维的MDU解决方案。使用从专家访谈（研究1）中得出的美学属性对所确定的维度进行标注。这些维度代表了物品属性各异的审美判断的相关维度。研究2表明，人们针对不同类别的物品使用不同的审美判断维度。随后，利用所确定的维度构建了三组系统变化的日常物品和一组系统变化的绘画。在研究3中，使用这些刺激材料进行联合分析，结果表明这些维度对整体审美判断的重要性各不相同。
