• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为日常用品美学价值指标的表面整洁度。

Surface neatness as an index of aesthetic value of everyday objects.

作者信息

Ledneva Tatiana, Myachykov Andriy, Shtyrov Yury

机构信息

Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 10;16:1578785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1578785. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1578785
PMID:40709233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12288685/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surface neatness is a fundamental yet underexplored determinant of the aesthetic evaluation of everyday objects. While prior research has typically examined individual surface features - such as gloss, shine, dirt, or scratches - in isolation, the holistic impact of surface neatness has received little systematic attention.

METHODS

In this study, participants viewed images of objects from five categories (household items, tools, personal use items, stationery, and kitchen utensils), each presented in three surface conditions: untidy (displaying mechanical and hygienic defects), neutral (without visible defects), and neat (exhibiting gloss and cleanliness). For each object, participants provided a preference rating reflecting their aesthetic evaluation.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed a robust effect of surface neatness on aesthetic preference: objects in the untidy condition consistently received the lowest ratings, while neat surfaces were rated most attractive. The differences between all surface conditions were statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

These results demonstrate that surface neatness is a dynamic and salient factor shaping the perceived value and desirability of everyday objects. The findings underscore the need for more rigorous operationalization of surface properties in empirical research on human-object interaction and suggest practical applications for product design, consumer psychology, and sustainable practices, where surface conditions directly influence aesthetic experience and object appeal.

摘要

引言

表面整洁度是日常物品美学评价中一个基本但未被充分探索的决定因素。虽然先前的研究通常单独考察个体表面特征,如光泽、亮度、污垢或划痕,但表面整洁度的整体影响很少受到系统关注。

方法

在本研究中,参与者观看了五类物品(家居用品、工具、个人用品、文具和厨房用具)的图片,每种物品呈现三种表面状态:不整洁(显示机械和卫生缺陷)、中性(无可见缺陷)和整洁(呈现光泽和清洁)。对于每件物品,参与者给出反映其美学评价的偏好评分。

结果

分析显示表面整洁度对美学偏好有显著影响:处于不整洁状态的物品始终获得最低评分,而整洁表面被评为最具吸引力。所有表面状态之间的差异具有统计学意义。

讨论

这些结果表明,表面整洁度是塑造日常物品感知价值和吸引力的一个动态且显著的因素。研究结果强调在人类与物品交互的实证研究中,需要对表面属性进行更严格的操作化,并为产品设计、消费者心理学和可持续实践提出了实际应用建议,其中表面状态直接影响美学体验和物品吸引力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf1/12288685/b350524b0ee1/fpsyg-16-1578785-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf1/12288685/65ea6b7ff196/fpsyg-16-1578785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf1/12288685/a99b339219ac/fpsyg-16-1578785-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf1/12288685/d170af82e9e9/fpsyg-16-1578785-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf1/12288685/b350524b0ee1/fpsyg-16-1578785-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf1/12288685/65ea6b7ff196/fpsyg-16-1578785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf1/12288685/a99b339219ac/fpsyg-16-1578785-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf1/12288685/d170af82e9e9/fpsyg-16-1578785-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf1/12288685/b350524b0ee1/fpsyg-16-1578785-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Surface neatness as an index of aesthetic value of everyday objects.作为日常用品美学价值指标的表面整洁度。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 10;16:1578785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1578785. eCollection 2025.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
9
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
10
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征

本文引用的文献

1
Repeated measures ANOVA and adjusted -tests when sphericity is violated: which procedure is best?当球对称性假设被违背时的重复测量方差分析和校正检验:哪种方法最佳?
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 30;14:1192453. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192453. eCollection 2023.
2
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
On the Questionable Appeal of Glossy/Shiny Food Packaging.关于光鲜/闪亮食品包装的可疑吸引力
Foods. 2021 Apr 28;10(5):959. doi: 10.3390/foods10050959.
4
Adjectives Modulate Sensorimotor Activation Driven by Nouns.形容词调节名词驱动的感觉运动激活。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Mar;45(3):e12953. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12953.
5
Symmetry preference in shapes, faces, flowers and landscapes.形状、面孔、花朵和风景中的对称偏好。
PeerJ. 2019 Jun 17;7:e7078. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7078. eCollection 2019.
6
Disgust in Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders: Recent Findings and Future Directions.焦虑症和强迫症中的厌恶情绪:最新发现和未来方向。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Aug 9;20(9):68. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0936-5.
7
The perception of gloss: a review.光泽感的认知:综述
Vision Res. 2015 Apr;109:221-35. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.026. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
8
Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics.十年的审美鉴赏与审美判断模型:审美事件——实证美学的发展与挑战
Br J Psychol. 2014 Nov;105(4):443-64. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12084.
9
Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS) phase II: 930 new normative photos.标准化刺激库(BOSS)第二阶段:930张新的标准照片。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e106953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106953. eCollection 2014.
10
Visual perception of materials and their properties.材料及其属性的视觉感知。
Vision Res. 2014 Jan;94:62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 27.