• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们了解他人的视觉喜好吗?

Do we know others' visual liking?

作者信息

Niimi Ryosuke, Watanabe Katsumi

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; e-mail:

Research Centre for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; e-mail:

出版信息

Iperception. 2014 Nov 20;5(7):572-84. doi: 10.1068/i0661. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1068/i0661
PMID:25926965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4411980/
Abstract

Although personal liking varies considerably, there is a general trend of liking shared by many people (public favour). Visual liking in particular may be largely shared by people, as it is strongly influenced by relatively low-level perceptual factors. If so, it is likely that people have correct knowledge of public favour. We examined the human ability to predict public favour. In three experiments, participants rated the subjective likability of various visual objects (e.g. car, chair), and predicted the mean liking rating by other participants. Irrespective of the object's category, the correlation between individual prediction and actual mean liking of others (prediction validity) was not higher than the correlation between the predictor's own liking and the mean liking of others. Further, individual prediction correlated more with the predictor's own liking than it was with others' liking. Namely, predictions were biased towards the predictor's subjective liking (a variation of the false consensus effect). The results suggest that humans do not have (or cannot access) correct knowledge of public favour. It was suggested that increasing the number of predictors is the appropriate strategy for making a good prediction of public favour.

摘要

尽管个人喜好差异很大,但许多人存在一种共同的喜好趋势(公众偏好)。特别是视觉喜好,很可能在很大程度上为人们所共有,因为它受到相对较低层次的感知因素的强烈影响。如果是这样,人们很可能对公众偏好有正确的认知。我们研究了人类预测公众偏好的能力。在三个实验中,参与者对各种视觉对象(如汽车、椅子)的主观喜爱程度进行评分,并预测其他参与者的平均喜爱评分。无论对象的类别如何,个体预测与他人实际平均喜爱程度之间的相关性(预测效度)并不高于预测者自身喜好与他人平均喜好之间的相关性。此外,个体预测与预测者自身喜好的相关性高于与他人喜好的相关性。也就是说,预测偏向于预测者的主观喜好(虚假共识效应的一种变体)。结果表明,人类没有(或无法获取)关于公众偏好的正确认知。有人提出,增加预测者的数量是对公众偏好做出良好预测的合适策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8700/4411980/c840eaa346e2/i-perception-5-572-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8700/4411980/27952883cd59/i-perception-5-572-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8700/4411980/a178672b0235/i-perception-5-572-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8700/4411980/c840eaa346e2/i-perception-5-572-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8700/4411980/27952883cd59/i-perception-5-572-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8700/4411980/a178672b0235/i-perception-5-572-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8700/4411980/c840eaa346e2/i-perception-5-572-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Do we know others' visual liking?我们了解他人的视觉喜好吗?
Iperception. 2014 Nov 20;5(7):572-84. doi: 10.1068/i0661. eCollection 2014.
2
EEG Beta Oscillations in the Temporoparietal Area Related to the Accuracy in Estimating Others' Preference.颞顶叶区域的脑电图β振荡与估计他人偏好的准确性有关。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 9;12:43. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00043. eCollection 2018.
3
Why Can't We Accurately Predict Others' Decisions? Prediction Discrepancy in Risky Decision-Making.为什么我们不能准确预测他人的决策?风险决策中的预测差异。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 13;9:2190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02190. eCollection 2018.
4
Liking Predicts Judgments of Authenticity in Real-Time Interactions More Robustly Than Personality States or Affect.与人格状态或情感相比,在实时互动中,喜好更能有力地预测真实性判断。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan 9:1461672231218758. doi: 10.1177/01461672231218758.
5
Do I really feel it? The contributions of subjective fluency and compatibility in low-level effects on aesthetic appreciation.我真的能感觉到吗?主观流畅性和兼容性在审美欣赏的低层次效应中的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 26;9:373. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00373. eCollection 2015.
6
The liking-similarity effect: perceptions of similarity as a function of liking.喜欢相似效应:相似性知觉作为喜欢的函数。
J Soc Psychol. 2014 Sep-Oct;154(5):384-400. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.914882.
7
I prefer what you can see: The role of visual perspective-taking on the gaze-liking effect.我更倾向于你所能看到的:视觉视角采择在凝视-喜爱效应中的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(8):e29615. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29615. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
8
Hedonic responses as predictors of food choice: flexibility and self-prediction.享乐反应作为食物选择的预测指标:灵活性与自我预测
Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
9
Effects of liking on visual attention in faces and paintings.喜好对人脸和绘画视觉注意力的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jun;197:115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
Personality traits affect the influences of intensity perception and emotional responses on hedonic rating and preference rank toward basic taste solutions.人格特质会影响味觉溶液的强度感知和情绪反应对享乐评价和偏好顺序的影响。
J Neurosci Res. 2019 Mar;97(3):276-291. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24321. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling visual aesthetic perception: bridges between computed texture features and perceived beauty qualities in semantic experiments.视觉审美感知建模:语义实验中计算纹理特征与感知美感品质之间的桥梁
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Dec;16(6):1379-1391. doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09783-5. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Consistency of likeability of objects across views and time.
Perception. 2012;41(6):673-86. doi: 10.1068/p7240.
2
Toward a brain-based theory of beauty.朝向基于大脑的美的理论。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021852. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
3
Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction.熟悉感确实会促进现场互动中的吸引力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):557-70. doi: 10.1037/a0022885.
4
Neural responses to unattended products predict later consumer choices.未关注产品的神经反应可预测消费者后期的选择。
J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 9;30(23):8024-31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0064-10.2010.
5
Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.美在观者心中:对抽象图像有着高度个性化的品味,但对现实世界图像则不然。
J Vis. 2010 Feb 22;10(2):18.1-14. doi: 10.1167/10.2.18.
6
An automatic valuation system in the human brain: evidence from functional neuroimaging.人类大脑中的自动估值系统:来自功能神经成像的证据。
Neuron. 2009 Nov 12;64(3):431-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.040.
7
Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.利用显性配偶偏好来评估配偶选择的市场力量和差异偏好解释。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;96(6):1226-44. doi: 10.1037/a0015300.
8
Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.区分面部平均性与吸引力:有吸引力的面孔并非总是具有平均特征。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1420-30. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1420.
9
Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions.面部偏好决策背后神经过程的时间隔离。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 13;104(46):18253-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703101104. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
10
Aesthetic properties of everyday objects.日常物品的美学特性。
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Jun;104(3 Pt 2):1139-68. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.4.1139-1168.