Rayburn William F
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131-0001, USA.
J Reprod Med. 2007 Aug;52(8):671-6.
A systematic review of the literature was performed on the risks associated with elective induction of labor. A MEDLINE search was undertaken of articles based on the criterion that elective induction was central to the article. Manuscripts were in English in core clinical journals from 1996 to 2005. Articles before 1996 were included if they added historical information relevant to the topics. Despite not being evidence based, elective inductions are becoming more acceptable and account for approximately 10% of deliveries. A high cesarean rate for nulliparas is the most undesired effect when undergoing induction with an unfavorable cervix. A longer intrapartum course can overutilize resources. Until larger, prospective clinical trials are performed, it will be difficult to evaluate the impact of the elective induction of labor on populationwide cesarean delivery rates. More attention should be directed toward whether the experience of elective induction is satisfactory to the patient, obstetrician and intrapartum crew.
对与选择性引产相关的风险进行了文献系统综述。基于选择性引产是文章核心内容这一标准,对MEDLINE数据库进行了文章检索。纳入的手稿为1996年至2005年发表在核心临床期刊上的英文文章。如果1996年以前的文章能提供与主题相关的历史信息,则予以纳入。尽管缺乏循证依据,但选择性引产正变得越来越被接受,约占分娩总数的10%。对于未产妇而言,在宫颈条件不佳时进行引产,最高发的不良后果是剖宫产率升高。产程延长会过度消耗资源。在开展更大规模的前瞻性临床试验之前,很难评估选择性引产对全人群剖宫产率的影响。应更多关注选择性引产的经历对患者、产科医生及产时医护人员来说是否令人满意。