McKay James R
University of Pennsylvania, Treatment Research Center, 3900 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Oct;31(10 Suppl):48s-54s. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00493.x.
In addictions treatment research, there has been a relative paucity of work on mechanisms of action that account for observed treatment effects. In studies that have been done, there is little evidence that the purported active ingredients of behavioral interventions such as cognitive-behavioral treatment or motivational interviewing actually mediate treatment effects. This suggests that new approaches are needed to study the process of change in behavioral treatments for addiction.
This article reviews several approaches that have been taken by psychotherapy researchers to identify mechanisms of change, including studies of critical sessions, change across sessions, and the relative importance of general vs. specific therapeutic factors.
These approaches all involve careful assessment of both therapist and patient behaviors during treatment sessions and study the relation of these factors to improvements or deteriorations in symptoms over the following weeks.
Suggestions are offered for how these methods could be used in addiction treatment research to generate hypotheses regarding mechanisms of change that could subsequently be tested in controlled studies.
在成瘾治疗研究中,关于解释所观察到的治疗效果的作用机制的研究相对较少。在已开展的研究中,几乎没有证据表明认知行为疗法或动机访谈等行为干预的所谓有效成分实际上介导了治疗效果。这表明需要新的方法来研究成瘾行为治疗中的改变过程。
本文综述了心理治疗研究人员为确定改变机制所采用的几种方法,包括对关键疗程的研究、各疗程间的变化以及一般治疗因素与特定治疗因素的相对重要性。
这些方法都涉及在治疗过程中对治疗师和患者行为进行仔细评估,并研究这些因素与接下来几周症状改善或恶化之间的关系。
针对如何将这些方法用于成瘾治疗研究以生成关于改变机制的假设提出了建议,这些假设随后可在对照研究中进行检验。