Bachar E
Department of Psychiatry, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1998;35(2):128-35.
In the last two decades there has been a remarkable expansion in research on psychotherapy in two areas: (a) assessing the effectiveness of psychotherapy compared to wait-list, no-treatment patient groups and groups treated with pharmacotherapy; (b) investigating curative factors in the therapeutic process: the extent of the psychotherapist's experience and kinds of interventions and errors in handling techniques. The first section of the review deals with the first of these areas and the second with the other. The following are the main research findings: 1. The effectiveness of psychotherapy compared to wait-list and non-treatment groups has been proven by so many research papers that there is hardly any need t do so again; 2. Psychotherapy was found to be effective in treating focused psychiatric disorders such as OCD, depression and anxiety disorders (with preference to cognitive-behavioral approaches) over psychodynamic approaches, and in some instances in preference to pharmacotherapy). Psychotherapy was also effective in less focused disorders, such as personality disorders and mixed neurotics (with preference to psychodynamic approaches over cognitive-behavioral approaches); 3. The advantages of patients receiving psychotherapy over those who did not receive it persisted in follow-up studies of one year's duration or more; 4. Psychotherapy was more effective than "psychotherapeutic placebo" (the encounter between therapist and patient where systematic psychotherapeutic work using one out of the three main psychotherapeutic approaches is experimentally prevented), which in turn was more effective than wait-list or non-treatment groups; 5. Psychotherapeutic maintenance of one session a month was effective in preventing relapse; 6. Experienced psychotherapists are more effective than beginners; 7. Empathy, the ability to identify the central thread of the session, and encouragement of the patient to reflect were found to be the key factors in techniques most associated with therapeutic success.
在过去二十年里,心理治疗研究在两个领域有了显著扩展:(a)与等待名单组、未治疗患者组以及接受药物治疗的组相比,评估心理治疗的有效性;(b)调查治疗过程中的治愈因素:心理治疗师的经验程度、干预类型以及处理技术中的失误。综述的第一部分涉及这些领域中的第一个,第二部分涉及另一个。以下是主要研究发现:1. 与等待名单组和未治疗组相比,心理治疗的有效性已被众多研究论文证实,几乎无需再次证明;2. 发现心理治疗在治疗特定精神疾病如强迫症、抑郁症和焦虑症方面(更倾向于认知行为疗法而非心理动力疗法)比心理动力疗法有效,在某些情况下甚至优于药物治疗。心理治疗在不太特定的疾病如人格障碍和混合型神经症方面也有效(更倾向于心理动力疗法而非认知行为疗法);3. 在为期一年或更长时间的随访研究中,接受心理治疗的患者比未接受治疗的患者的优势依然存在;4. 心理治疗比“心理治疗安慰剂”(在实验中阻止使用三种主要心理治疗方法之一进行系统心理治疗工作的治疗师与患者的接触)更有效,而“心理治疗安慰剂”又比等待名单组或未治疗组更有效;5. 每月一次的心理治疗维持治疗对预防复发有效;6. 经验丰富的心理治疗师比新手更有效;7. 同理心、识别治疗过程主线的能力以及鼓励患者反思被发现是与治疗成功最相关的技术中的关键因素。