Behavioral Research in Technology and Engineering (BRiTE) Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (CASAA) and Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Mar;79(2):182-189. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.182.
Interest in studying mechanisms of behavior change (MOBCs) in substance use disorder (SUD) treatments has grown considerably in the past two decades. Much of this work has focused on identifying which variables statistically mediate the effect of SUD treatments on clinical outcomes. However, a fuller conceptualization of MOBCs will require greater understanding of questions that extend beyond traditional mediation analysis, including better understanding of when MOBCs change during treatment, when they are most critical to aiding the initiation or maintenance of change, and how MOBCs themselves arise as a function of treatment processes.
In the present study, we review why these MOBC-related questions are often minimally addressed in empirical research and provide examples of data analytic methods that may address these issues. We highlight several recent studies that have used such methods and discuss how these methods can provide unique theoretical insights and actionable clinical information.
Several statistical approaches can enhance the field's understanding of the timing and development of MOBCs, including growth-curve modeling, time-varying effect modeling, moderated mediation analysis, dynamic systems modeling, and simulation methods.
Adopting greater diversity in methods for modeling MOBCs will help researchers better understand the timing and development of key change variables and will expand the theoretical precision and clinical impact of MOBC research. Advances in research design, measurement, and technology are key to supporting these advances.
在过去的二十年中,人们对研究物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗中行为改变机制(MOBC)的兴趣大大增加。这项工作的很大一部分重点是确定哪些变量可以从统计学上解释 SUD 治疗对临床结果的影响。然而,更全面地理解 MOBC 需要更深入地了解超出传统中介分析范围的问题,包括更好地理解 MOBC 在治疗过程中何时发生变化、何时对促进或维持变化最关键,以及 MOBC 本身如何作为治疗过程的一个函数而出现。
在本研究中,我们回顾了为什么这些与 MOBC 相关的问题在实证研究中通常很少被提及,并提供了可能解决这些问题的数据分析方法的示例。我们强调了一些最近使用这些方法的研究,并讨论了这些方法如何提供独特的理论见解和可操作的临床信息。
几种统计方法可以增强人们对 MOBC 时机和发展的理解,包括增长曲线模型、时变效应模型、调节中介分析、动态系统模型和模拟方法。
采用更多样化的 MOBC 建模方法将有助于研究人员更好地理解关键变化变量的时机和发展,并提高 MOBC 研究的理论精确性和临床影响力。研究设计、测量和技术的进步是支持这些进展的关键。