Wirtz Philip W
Department of Decision Sciences, The George Washington University, 2001 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Oct;31(10 Suppl):57s-63s. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00495.x.
While causal modeling is generally well known to alcohol researchers, several causal structures (including suppression, mediated moderation, and moderated mediation) are often poorly understood and seldom employed when investigators seek to model the complex mechanisms of behavior change, despite their widespread applicability to the field.
This paper compares and contrasts five basic structures of causal modeling in the context of contemporary alcohol research and demonstrates how mechanisms of behavior change can be conceptualized and tested as parallel and serial sequences of these basic causal structures, forming causal chains.
Recent methodological developments, while representing an important advancement for the field, fail to adequately address the complexities of alcohol dependence phenomena. A differentiation between frequently combined forms of these causal structures is proposed that would better address the needs of the field.
虽然因果建模在酒精研究人员中普遍广为人知,但在研究人员试图对行为改变的复杂机制进行建模时,几种因果结构(包括抑制、中介调节和调节中介)往往理解不足且很少被采用,尽管它们在该领域具有广泛的适用性。
本文在当代酒精研究的背景下比较和对比了因果建模的五种基本结构,并展示了行为改变的机制如何被概念化为这些基本因果结构的平行和序列序列,形成因果链并进行测试。
最近的方法学发展虽然代表了该领域的一项重要进步,但未能充分解决酒精依赖现象的复杂性。建议对这些因果结构的常见组合形式进行区分,以更好地满足该领域的需求。