Suppr超能文献

治疗效果中介因素的案例研究。

A case study of mediators of treatment effectiveness.

作者信息

Karno Mitchell P

机构信息

Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California-Los Angeles, 11075 Santa Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Oct;31(10 Suppl):33s-39s. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00491.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent research has observed that the use of confrontation in psychosocial treatment for alcohol abuse or dependence has a negative effect on posttreatment alcohol use among patients at average or above average levels of trait anger. It is not known what mediates that negative effect. The current study examines the role of session attendance as a mediator of the effect of confrontation on patients' subsequent alcohol use. In doing so, the study demonstrates the process of testing for mediation as well as planning analyses to meet additional conditions that can lend support to a causal mechanism of change.

METHODS

Multiple regression analyses were used to test for session attendance as a mediator among 107 individuals with alcohol abuse or dependence who received either cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (n = 39), motivational enhancement therapy (MET) (n = 34), or twelve-step facilitation therapy (TSF) (n = 34). Emphasis was placed on achieving the desired temporal sequence of the therapy intervention, the mediator, and the outcome variable.

RESULTS

The data supported the role of session attendance as a partial mediator of the effect of confrontation on future alcohol use among patients who received CBT, but not among patients who received MET or TSF. In CBT, other potential mediators (e.g., therapeutic alliance and in-session resistance) were not supported and did not change the support for session attendance in the model. Beyond mediation, some but not all criteria for a causal mechanism of change were also met.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that in CBT the negative impact of confrontation early in treatment is partially explained by a reduction in the number of sessions patients attended. Different processes appear to be occurring in MET and TSF. By carefully constructing analytic models, results can speak both to issues of mediation and to causal mechanisms of change.

摘要

背景

最近的研究发现,在针对酒精滥用或依赖的心理社会治疗中,对抗的使用对特质愤怒水平处于平均或高于平均水平的患者的治疗后饮酒情况有负面影响。目前尚不清楚是什么介导了这种负面影响。本研究考察了治疗疗程出席率作为对抗对患者后续饮酒影响的中介作用。在此过程中,该研究展示了检验中介作用的过程以及规划分析以满足有助于支持因果变化机制的其他条件。

方法

对107名酒精滥用或依赖患者进行了多元回归分析,以检验治疗疗程出席率的中介作用,这些患者分别接受了认知行为疗法(CBT)(n = 39)、动机增强疗法(MET)(n = 34)或十二步促进疗法(TSF)(n = 34)。重点在于实现治疗干预、中介变量和结果变量所需的时间顺序。

结果

数据支持治疗疗程出席率在接受CBT的患者中作为对抗对未来饮酒影响的部分中介作用,但在接受MET或TSF的患者中则不然。在CBT中,其他潜在中介变量(如治疗联盟和治疗过程中的阻抗)未得到支持,且未改变模型中对治疗疗程出席率的支持。除了中介作用外,还满足了一些但并非所有的因果变化机制标准。

结论

本研究表明,在CBT中,治疗早期对抗的负面影响部分可由患者出席治疗疗程数量的减少来解释。MET和TSF中似乎发生了不同的过程。通过精心构建分析模型,结果既可以说明中介问题,也可以说明因果变化机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验