Quadflieg Susanne, Wendt Beate, Mohr Alexander, Miltner Wolfgang H R, Straube Thomas
Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany.
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Dec;45(12):3096-103. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
Studies using facial emotional expressions as stimuli partially support the assumption of biased processing of social signals in social phobia. This pilot study explored for the first time whether individuals with social phobia display a processing bias towards emotional prosody. Fifteen individuals with generalized social phobia and fifteen healthy controls (HC) matched for gender, age, and education completed a recognition test consisting of meaningless utterances spoken in a neutral, angry, sad, fearful, disgusted or happy tone of voice. Participants also evaluated the stimuli with regard to valence and arousal. While these ratings did not differ significantly between groups, analysis of the recognition test revealed enhanced identification of sad and fearful voices and decreased identification of happy voices in individuals with social phobia compared with HC. The two groups did not differ in their processing of neutral, disgust, and anger prosody.
以面部情绪表情作为刺激的研究部分支持了社交恐惧症中社会信号加工存在偏差的假设。这项初步研究首次探讨了社交恐惧症患者是否对情绪韵律存在加工偏差。15名广泛性社交恐惧症患者和15名在性别、年龄和教育程度上匹配的健康对照者完成了一项识别测试,该测试由用中性、愤怒、悲伤、恐惧、厌恶或高兴的语调说出的无意义话语组成。参与者还对刺激的效价和唤醒程度进行了评估。虽然这些评分在两组之间没有显著差异,但识别测试分析显示,与健康对照者相比,社交恐惧症患者对悲伤和恐惧声音的识别增强,对高兴声音的识别减少。两组在中性、厌恶和愤怒韵律的加工上没有差异。