Diaper C, Sharma A
CSIRO Land and Water, Graham Road, Highett, Melbourne, VIC 3190, Australia.
Water Sci Technol. 2007;56(5):97-103. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.561.
The development and implementation of alternative wastewater servicing approaches in rural communities in Australia appears more feasible than in larger urban developments as many rural centres rely on septic tanks and surface discharge of greywater. This method of disposal creates many environmental, social and economic issues and is seen to limit potential for growth in many towns. This paper describes a generic methodology for the selection of innovative sewerage options for six regional towns in Victoria, Australia. The method includes consultation with stakeholders, multi-criteria assessment and concept design of the most favourable option. Despite the broad range of initial wastewater servicing options presented which included cluster-scale systems, upgrade of existing systems, greywater reuse and alternative collection, the outcome for five of the six towns was a modified centralised collection system as the preferred option. Lack of robust and reliable data on the human health risks and environmental impacts of alternative systems were identified as the primary data gaps in the sustainability assessment. In addition, biases in the assessment method due to stakeholder perceptions were found to be an additional issue.
在澳大利亚农村社区,与大型城市开发项目相比,开发和实施替代性废水处理方法似乎更可行,因为许多农村中心依赖化粪池和灰水的地表排放。这种处理方式产生了许多环境、社会和经济问题,并且被认为限制了许多城镇的发展潜力。本文描述了为澳大利亚维多利亚州六个区域城镇选择创新污水排放选项的通用方法。该方法包括与利益相关者进行磋商、多标准评估以及对最有利选项进行概念设计。尽管最初提出了广泛的废水处理选项,包括集群规模系统、现有系统升级、灰水回用和替代收集,但六个城镇中有五个的结果是改良的集中收集系统作为首选。在可持续性评估中,替代性系统对人类健康风险和环境影响缺乏可靠数据被确定为主要数据缺口。此外,发现由于利益相关者的认知导致评估方法存在偏差是另一个问题。