Hochstrat R, Joksimovic D, Wintgens T, Melin T, Savic D
Department of Chemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Turmstr. 46, 52056, Aachen, Germany.
Water Sci Technol. 2007;56(5):175-82. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.570.
The reuse of upgraded wastewater for beneficial uses is increasingly adopted and accepted as a tool in water management. However, funding of schemes is still a critical issue. The focus of this paper is on economic considerations of water reuse planning. A survey of pricing mechanisms for reclaimed water revealed that most schemes are subsidised to a great extent. In order to minimise these state contributions to the implementation and operation of reuse projects, their planning should identify a least cost design option. This also has to take into account the established pricing structure for conventional water resources and the possibility of gaining revenues from reclaimed water pricing. The paper presents a case study which takes into account these aspects. It evaluates different scheme designs with regard to their Net Present Value (NPV). It could be demonstrated that for the same charging level, quite different amounts of reclaimed water can be delivered while still producing an overall positive NPV. Moreover, the economic feasibility and competitiveness of a reuse scheme is highly determined by the cost structure of the conventional water market.
将升级后的再生水用于有益用途,正日益被用作水资源管理的一种手段并得到认可。然而,相关项目的资金问题仍是关键所在。本文重点关注水回用规划的经济考量。一项关于再生水定价机制的调查显示,大多数项目在很大程度上都依赖补贴。为尽量减少国家对回用项目实施和运营的投入,项目规划应确定成本最低的设计方案。这还必须考虑到常规水资源既定的定价结构以及通过再生水定价获取收益的可能性。本文给出了一个考虑到这些方面的案例研究。它针对不同方案设计评估其净现值(NPV)。结果表明,在相同收费水平下,可输送的再生水量差异很大,但仍能产生总体为正的净现值。此外,回用方案的经济可行性和竞争力在很大程度上取决于常规水市场的成本结构。