Lyle Cari E, Wilson Matthew W, Li Chin-Shang, Kaste Sue C
Hamilton Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;23(5):393-6. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181462ca8.
To compare the difference in volume between enucleated and contralateral, uninvolved orbits in patients with unilateral retinoblastoma treated with primary enucleation who received either hydroxyapatite or solid silicone implants.
In this retrospective, comparative interventional case series, data were reviewed for all patients (N = 33) with retinoblastoma at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital who underwent unilateral enucleation and received either hydroxyapatite or solid silicone implant from 1969 to 1999. Patients who received external beam radiation or systemic chemotherapy were excluded. CT and/or MRI were used to compare the difference in orbital volumes between the enucleated orbit and the contralateral orbit in 13 patients who underwent enucleation with hydroxyapatite implants vs. 20 patients who underwent enucleation with silicone implants. The main outcome measure was the difference in volume between enucleated and contralateral, uninvolved orbits correlated to implant material, which we determined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
The median difference in orbital volumes between enucleated and contralateral, uninvolved orbits was 0.9 cm (range, -3.78 to 3.09 cm; quartiles, -0.37, 2.72 cm; mean +/- standard error [SE], 0.76 +/- 0.64 cm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.49 to 2.01 cm) for patients treated with hydroxyapatite implants vs. 0.63 cm (range, -4.43 to 3.91 cm; quartiles, 0, 2.13 cm; mean +/- SE, 0.8 +/- 0.41 cm; 95% CI, -0.004 to 1.6 cm) in patients treated with silicone sphere implants. The median differences did not differ between the 2 types of implant (p = .74). The median follow-up time was 137 months (range, 10-244 months; quartiles, 37, 179 months; mean +/- SE = 118.31 +/- 22.83 months; 95% CI, 73.56-163.06 months) and 144 months (range, 57-251 months; quartiles, 98, 154 months; mean +/- SE, 136.1 +/- 10.78 months; 95% CI, 114.97-157.23 months), respectively.
In unilateral retinoblastoma patients treated with primary enucleation, hydroxyapatite-integrated orbital implants provide no better symmetry of orbital volume than do more traditional silicone implants.
比较接受原发性眼球摘除术并植入羟基磷灰石或固体硅酮植入物的单侧视网膜母细胞瘤患者摘除眼球的眼眶与对侧未受累眼眶之间的体积差异。
在这个回顾性、比较性介入病例系列研究中,我们回顾了1969年至1999年在圣裘德儿童研究医院接受单侧眼球摘除术并植入羟基磷灰石或固体硅酮植入物的所有视网膜母细胞瘤患者(N = 33)的数据。排除接受外照射放疗或全身化疗的患者。使用CT和/或MRI比较13例接受羟基磷灰石植入物眼球摘除术的患者与20例接受硅酮植入物眼球摘除术的患者摘除眼球的眼眶与对侧眼眶之间的体积差异。主要观察指标是摘除眼球的眼眶与对侧未受累眼眶之间的体积差异与植入材料的相关性,我们使用Wilcoxon秩和检验来确定。
接受羟基磷灰石植入物治疗的患者,摘除眼球的眼眶与对侧未受累眼眶之间的眼眶体积中位数差异为0.9 cm(范围,-3.78至3.09 cm;四分位数,-0.37,2.72 cm;均值±标准误[SE],0.76±0.64 cm;95%置信区间[CI],-0.49至2.01 cm),而接受硅酮球植入物治疗的患者为0.63 cm(范围,-4.43至3.91 cm;四分位数,0,2.13 cm;均值±SE,0.8±0.41 cm;95% CI,-0.004至1.6 cm)。两种植入物类型之间的中位数差异无统计学意义(p = 0.74)。中位随访时间分别为137个月(范围,10 - 244个月;四分位数,37,179个月;均值±SE = 118.31±22.83个月;95% CI,73.56 - 163.06个月)和144个月(范围,57 - 251个月;四分位数,98,154个月;均值±SE,136.1±10.78个月;95% CI,114.97 - 157.23个月)。
在接受原发性眼球摘除术的单侧视网膜母细胞瘤患者中,与更传统的硅酮植入物相比,羟基磷灰石整合眼眶植入物在眼眶体积对称性方面并无优势。