Suppr超能文献

通过选择性洗脱及气相色谱-质谱联用分析测定废水和泉水中的酸性药物及潜在内分泌干扰化合物

Determination of acidic pharmaceuticals and potential endocrine disrupting compounds in wastewaters and spring waters by selective elution and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

作者信息

Gibson Richard, Becerril-Bravo Elías, Silva-Castro Vanessa, Jiménez Blanca

机构信息

Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 México, D.F., Mexico.

出版信息

J Chromatogr A. 2007 Oct 26;1169(1-2):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.08.056. Epub 2007 Aug 30.

Abstract

Although the trend in development of analytical methods for emerging contaminants is towards reduced sample preparation and increased detector selectivity, there are still benefits from removal of matrix material during sample preparation. This paper describes a simple method for acidic pharmaceuticals and a range of potential endocrine disrupting compounds in untreated wastewaters and spring waters. It is based on separation of the two classes during elution from the extraction cartridge with final analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. 3,4-D was used as the recovery standard for the acids while 4-n-nonylphenol and [2H4]estrone were used for the endocrine disrupters; mean recoveries varied between 89% and 111%. The method was also extensively validated by fortification with the target compounds. Recoveries of acids were from 68% to 97% with relative standard deviations generally less than 10% and recoveries of endocrine disrupters were 68-109% with relative standard deviations less than 20%. Detection limits varied from 0.005 to 1 ng/L in spring water, and from 0.5 to 100 ng/L in untreated wastewater. Concentrations of the analytes in the wastewater ranged from 0.018 to 22.4 microg/L. Values were comparable to reported data, although concentrations were generally relatively high, probably because of a lack of treatment. Triclosan, phthalates, estrone, 17beta-estradiol, ibuprofen, and naproxen were present in the spring water from aquifers recharged indirectly with this wastewater after its use for irrigation; concentrations ranged from 0.01 to 25.0 ng/L. The much lower concentrations compared to wastewater indicate effective removal processes on passage through the soil and subsoil.

摘要

尽管新兴污染物分析方法的发展趋势是减少样品前处理并提高检测器的选择性,但在样品前处理过程中去除基质材料仍有好处。本文描述了一种用于分析未经处理的废水和泉水中酸性药物及一系列潜在内分泌干扰化合物的简单方法。该方法基于在从萃取柱洗脱过程中对这两类化合物进行分离,最终通过气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪进行分析。3,4 - D用作酸类的回收率标准物,而4 - 正壬基酚和[2H4]雌酮用作内分泌干扰物的回收率标准物;平均回收率在89%至111%之间。该方法还通过添加目标化合物进行了广泛验证。酸类的回收率为68%至97%,相对标准偏差一般小于10%,内分泌干扰物的回收率为68%至109%,相对标准偏差小于20%。泉水中的检测限为0.005至1 ng/L,未经处理的废水中为0.5至100 ng/L。废水中分析物的浓度范围为0.018至22.4 μg/L。这些值与已报道的数据相当,尽管浓度通常相对较高,可能是因为缺乏处理。在用该废水灌溉后间接补给含水层的泉水中存在三氯生、邻苯二甲酸盐、雌酮、17β - 雌二醇、布洛芬和萘普生;浓度范围为0.01至25.0 ng/L。与废水相比浓度低得多,这表明在通过土壤和底土的过程中有有效的去除过程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验