Losanoff Julian E, Basson Marc D, Gruber Scott A, Huff Harold, Hsieh Fu-hung
Department of Surgery, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;84(4):1288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.023.
Healing of median sternotomy requires reliable sternal fixation. Although both single and double wire kits are commercially available, no experimental study has compared the two closures in a human cadaveric model. We used a recently described human experimental cadaveric model to compare the stability of the closures.
Sixteen fresh adult human cadaveric sternal plates with adjacent ribs were fixed with custom designed spiked stainless steel clamps and attached to a biomechanical testing device. Single No. 5 peristernal and double peristernal closures were tested. The stability of the unions was tested using perpendicular, repetitive force loads increasing from 0 to 800 Newtons at a rate of 0.5 mm/second.
The two study groups did not differ in age or sex. No clamp failures or damage to the specimens occurred. The double peristernal closure exhibited a significantly lower permanent displacement than the single wire group, suggesting a superior strength and stability of that closure.
To the extent to which this human cadaveric model resembles in vivo median sternotomy, these data suggest that the biomechanical stability of the peristernal double wire closure may exceed that of single wires.
正中胸骨切开术的愈合需要可靠的胸骨固定。虽然单丝和双丝套件在市场上均有销售,但尚无实验研究在人体尸体模型中对这两种闭合方式进行比较。我们使用最近描述的人体实验尸体模型来比较这两种闭合方式的稳定性。
16个带有相邻肋骨的新鲜成人尸体胸骨板用定制设计的带尖不锈钢夹固定,并连接到生物力学测试装置上。测试了单根5号胸骨旁钢丝和双根胸骨旁钢丝的闭合方式。使用垂直的、重复的力载荷以0.5毫米/秒的速度从0增加到800牛顿来测试骨结合的稳定性。
两个研究组在年龄或性别上没有差异。没有发生夹子失效或标本损坏的情况。双根胸骨旁钢丝闭合方式的永久位移明显低于单丝组,表明该闭合方式具有更高的强度和稳定性。
就该人体尸体模型与体内正中胸骨切开术的相似程度而言,这些数据表明胸骨旁双丝闭合方式的生物力学稳定性可能超过单丝。