• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获取方式作为聋儿阅读理解的一个因素。

Mode of acquisition as a factor in deaf children's reading comprehension.

作者信息

Wauters Loes N, Tellings Agnes E J M, van Bon Wim H J, Mak Willem M

机构信息

Department of Special Education, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Spring;13(2):175-92. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm050. Epub 2007 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1093/deafed/enm050
PMID:17890236
Abstract

This article examines the role of mode of acquisition (MoA) of word meanings in reading comprehension: children acquire word meanings using perceptual information (e.g., hearing, seeing, or smelling the referent) and/or linguistic information (e.g., verbal explanations). A total of 72 deaf and 99 hearing children between 7 and 15 years of age performed a self-paced reading task. Comprehension scores increased with age in both groups, but reading speed increased over age only for the hearing participants. For both groups, reading times on linguistically acquired words were longer than on perceptually acquired words. Although deaf children scored lower than hearing children in both conditions, comprehension scores for both groups were lower on linguistic items than on perceptual items. Thus, MoA influences reading comprehension, but the deaf show difficulty on both the perceptual and the linguistic items.

摘要

本文探讨了词汇意义获取方式(MoA)在阅读理解中的作用:儿童通过感知信息(如听到、看到或闻到所指对象)和/或语言信息(如口头解释)来获取词汇意义。共有72名7至15岁的聋童和99名听力正常的儿童完成了一项自定节奏的阅读任务。两组的理解分数均随年龄增长而提高,但仅听力正常的参与者的阅读速度随年龄增长而加快。对于两组来说,通过语言获取的词汇的阅读时间比通过感知获取的词汇的阅读时间更长。尽管在两种情况下聋童的得分都低于听力正常的儿童,但两组在语言项目上的理解分数都低于感知项目。因此,词汇意义获取方式会影响阅读理解,但聋童在感知和语言项目上都存在困难。

相似文献

1
Mode of acquisition as a factor in deaf children's reading comprehension.获取方式作为聋儿阅读理解的一个因素。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Spring;13(2):175-92. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm050. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
2
Reading comprehension of deaf children with cochlear implants.人工耳蜗植入聋儿的阅读理解能力。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Summer;12(3):283-302. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm017. Epub 2007 May 30.
3
Speech reading and learning to read: a comparison of 8-year-old profoundly deaf children with good and poor reading ability.唇读与学习阅读:对8岁阅读能力强和弱的重度失聪儿童的比较。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2006 Spring;11(2):189-201. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enj021. Epub 2006 Jan 12.
4
The signed reading fluency of students who are deaf/hard of hearing.有听力障碍的学生的手语阅读流畅度。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Winter;13(1):37-54. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm030. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
5
Deaf children's use of phonological coding: evidence from reading, spelling, and working memory.聋童对语音编码的运用:来自阅读、拼写和工作记忆的证据。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2004 Summer;9(3):253-68. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enh016.
6
Concurrent correlates and predictors of reading and spelling achievement in deaf and hearing school children.聋哑和听力正常学童阅读与拼写成绩的并发相关因素及预测因素
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2006 Summer;11(3):273-88. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enj037. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
7
Consequences of congenital hearing loss - a longterm view.先天性听力损失的后果——长期视角
J Otolaryngol. 1978 Dec;7(6):473-83.
8
Word-learning abilities in deaf and hard-of-hearing preschoolers: effect of lexicon size and language modality.聋哑和重听学龄前儿童的词汇学习能力:词汇量和语言形式的影响
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2009 Winter;14(1):44-62. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enn021. Epub 2008 May 20.
9
Using miscue analysis to assess comprehension in deaf college readers.运用错误分析评估聋人大学生读者的阅读理解能力。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Winter;16(1):35-46. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq017. Epub 2010 May 20.
10
Complex word reading in Dutch deaf children and adults.荷兰聋童和成年聋人的复杂单词阅读。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Mar;34(3):1083-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Abstract Words as Social Tools: Which Necessary Evidence?作为社会工具的抽象词汇:哪些是必要证据?
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 15;11:613026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613026. eCollection 2020.