Kempainen Robert R, Williams Cynthia B, Hazelwood Ann, Rubin Bruce K, Milla Carlos E
Minnesota Cystic Fibrosis Center, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Chest. 2007 Oct;132(4):1227-32. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1078. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
High-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) is commonly used by cystic fibrosis (CF) patients for airway clearance. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the use of a newer HFCWO device that generates oscillations with a triangular waveform results in greater sputum production than a commonly used device that generates oscillations with a sine waveform.
This was a controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Fifteen clinically stable, adult CF patients participated. Patients performed airway clearance with each device once and at matched oscillation frequencies and pressures. All sputum produced during each session was collected. Patients completed pulmonary function tests before and after each session, and rated the comfort of the two devices.
Mean sputum wet and dry weight produced during sine waveform and triangular waveform HFCWO sessions did not differ (p = 0.11 and p = 0.2, respectively). Mean changes in FEV(1) and FVC following HFCWO therapy were also comparable (p = 0.21 and p = 0.56, respectively). However, there was a significant reduction in air trapping by residual volume/total lung capacity ratio following triangular waveform HFCWO (p = 0.01). In addition, in vitro cough transportability was 10.6% greater following therapy with the triangular waveform device (p = 0.05). Patients perceived the two devices as equally comfortable (p = 0.8).
Single-session sputum production is comparable with sine and triangular waveform HFCWO devices. Longer term comparisons are needed to determine whether sustained use of the devices results in clinically important differences in outcomes.
高频胸壁振荡(HFCWO)常用于囊性纤维化(CF)患者的气道清理。本研究的主要目的是确定使用一种能产生三角波形振荡的新型HFCWO设备是否比常用的能产生正弦波形振荡的设备能产生更多的痰液。
这是一项对照、随机、双盲、交叉研究。15名临床稳定的成年CF患者参与。患者分别使用每种设备进行一次气道清理,且振荡频率和压力匹配。收集每次治疗期间产生的所有痰液。患者在每次治疗前后完成肺功能测试,并对两种设备的舒适度进行评分。
正弦波形和三角波形HFCWO治疗期间产生的痰液平均湿重和干重无差异(分别为p = 0.11和p = 0.2)。HFCWO治疗后第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)和用力肺活量(FVC)的平均变化也相当(分别为p = 0.21和p = 0.56)。然而,三角波形HFCWO治疗后残气量/肺总量比值所反映的气体潴留明显减少(p = 0.01)。此外,使用三角波形设备治疗后体外咳嗽传输能力提高了10.6%(p = 0.05)。患者认为两种设备的舒适度相同(p = 0.8)。
单次治疗中,正弦波形和三角波形HFCWO设备产生的痰液量相当。需要进行长期比较以确定持续使用这些设备是否会在临床结果上产生重要差异。