• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与标准胸部物理治疗相比,高频胸壁振荡对囊性纤维化患者雾化二乙烯三胺五乙酸中心和外周分布的影响。

Effect of high-frequency chest wall oscillation on the central and peripheral distribution of aerosolized diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid as compared to standard chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis.

作者信息

Stites Steven W, Perry Gayln V, Peddicord Tom, Cox Glen, McMillan Chris, Becker Brian

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Mail Stop 3007, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2006 Mar;129(3):712-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.3.712.

DOI:10.1378/chest.129.3.712
PMID:16537872
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) has been shown to be as effective as standard chest physiotherapy (SCPT) for removal of pulmonary secretions as well as increasing FEV(1) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Patients using HFCWO often administer aerosolized medications simultaneously, reducing time required for daily care. While peripheral pulmonary distribution of tracer in normal subjects has been shown to be unaffected by HFCWO, this has not been studied in CF patients. We evaluated distribution of aerosolized (99m)Tc diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (DTPA) administered simultaneously with HFCWO and compared this with DTPA aerosolized after SCPT.

STUDY DESIGN

Ten CF patients, ages 22 to 38 years, with moderate-to-severe obstructive disease were studied in a crossover design after documentation of stable lung function. (133)Xe was administered to delineate total lung volume. DTPA was aerosolized (Pari LC Plus nebulizer and Pulmo-Aide compressor; Pari Respiratory Equipment Inc.; Richmond, VA) to delineate airway deposition. The central to peripheral deposition ratio (C/P ratio) of each lung was analyzed in each study group. Central regions were represented by the inner one third of the (133)Xe scan as demonstrated in previous research models.

RESULTS

The mean C/P ratio (+/- SD) for both lungs was 1.45 +/- 0.31 with HFCWO and 1.46 +/- 0.28 following SCPT (p = not significant [NS]). Right lung mean C/P ratio was 1.74 +/- 0.43 with HFCWO and 1.85 +/- 0.63 after SCPT (p = NS). Left lung mean C/P ratio was 1.25 +/- 0.29 with HFCWO and 1.21 +/- 0.35 after SCPT (p = NS). There was no correlation between C/P ratio and FEV(1) or FVC.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of HFCWO in combination with aerosolized DTPA did not result in increased central deposition as compared with aerosolized DTPA administered after SCPT. Further study is required to determine if combining HFCWO with aerosolized medications can be modified to improve peripheral deposition.

摘要

背景与目的

高频胸壁振荡(HFCWO)已被证明在清除囊性纤维化(CF)患者肺部分泌物以及提高第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)方面与标准胸部物理治疗(SCPT)效果相当。使用HFCWO的患者通常会同时雾化吸入药物,从而减少日常护理所需时间。虽然正常受试者中示踪剂的外周肺分布不受HFCWO影响,但尚未在CF患者中进行研究。我们评估了与HFCWO同时给予的雾化(⁹⁹ᵐTc)二乙烯三胺五乙酸(DTPA)的分布情况,并将其与SCPT后雾化的DTPA进行比较。

研究设计

对10名年龄在22至38岁、患有中度至重度阻塞性疾病的CF患者进行交叉设计研究,研究前记录其稳定的肺功能。给予(¹³³)Xe以描绘肺总量。雾化吸入DTPA(使用Pari LC Plus雾化器和Pulmo - Aide压缩机;Pari呼吸设备公司;弗吉尼亚州里士满)以描绘气道沉积。在每个研究组中分析每个肺的中央与外周沉积比(C/P比)。如先前研究模型所示,中央区域由(¹³³)Xe扫描的内三分之一表示。

结果

HFCWO时双肺的平均C/P比(±标准差)为1.45±0.31,SCPT后为1.46±0.28(p =无显著差异[NS])。HFCWO时右肺平均C/P比为1.74±0.43,SCPT后为1.85±0.63(p = NS)。HFCWO时左肺平均C/P比为1.25±0.29,SCPT后为1.21±0.35(p = NS)。C/P比与FEV₁或用力肺活量(FVC)之间无相关性。

结论

与SCPT后雾化吸入DTPA相比,HFCWO联合雾化吸入DTPA并未导致中央沉积增加。需要进一步研究以确定将HFCWO与雾化药物联合使用是否可以进行调整以改善外周沉积。

相似文献

1
Effect of high-frequency chest wall oscillation on the central and peripheral distribution of aerosolized diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid as compared to standard chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis.与标准胸部物理治疗相比,高频胸壁振荡对囊性纤维化患者雾化二乙烯三胺五乙酸中心和外周分布的影响。
Chest. 2006 Mar;129(3):712-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.3.712.
2
Comparison of high-frequency chest wall oscillation with differing waveforms for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者气道清除中不同波形的高频胸壁振荡比较
Chest. 2007 Oct;132(4):1227-32. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1078. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
3
Long-term multicentre randomised controlled study of high frequency chest wall oscillation versus positive expiratory pressure mask in cystic fibrosis.高频胸壁振荡与呼气正压面罩治疗囊性纤维化的长期多中心随机对照研究。
Thorax. 2013 Aug;68(8):746-51. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202915. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
4
Physiologic evidence for high-frequency chest wall oscillation and positive expiratory pressure breathing in hospitalized subjects with cystic fibrosis.住院囊性纤维化患者高频胸壁振荡和呼气末正压呼吸的生理学证据。
Phys Ther. 2005 Dec;85(12):1278-89.
5
CNE article: pain after lung transplant: high-frequency chest wall oscillation vs chest physiotherapy.CNE 文章:肺移植后疼痛:高频胸壁振荡与胸部物理治疗。
Am J Crit Care. 2013 Mar;22(2):115-24. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013869.
6
The effectiveness of a mobile high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) device for airway clearance.一种用于气道清除的移动高频胸壁振荡(HFCWO)设备的有效性。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Aug;55(8):1984-1992. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24784. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
7
A comparison of bronchial drainage treatments in cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者支气管引流治疗的比较
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996 Oct;22(4):271-4. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199610)22:4<271::AID-PPUL7>3.0.CO;2-P.
8
Comparison of conventional pulmonary rehabilitation and high-frequency chest wall oscillation in primary ciliary dyskinesia.原发性纤毛运动障碍中传统肺康复与高频胸壁振荡的比较。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Jun;49(6):611-6. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22861. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
9
A pilot study of the impact of high-frequency chest wall oscillation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with mucus hypersecretion.高频胸壁振荡对慢性阻塞性肺疾病黏液高分泌患者影响的初步研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:693-9. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S22896. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
10
Short-term comparative study of high frequency chest wall oscillation and European airway clearance techniques in patients with cystic fibrosis.高频胸壁振荡与欧洲气道廓清技术在囊性纤维化患者中的短期对比研究。
Thorax. 2010 Mar;65(3):196-200. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.111492. Epub 2009 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Conventional chest physiotherapy compared to other airway clearance techniques for cystic fibrosis.常规胸部物理治疗与其他气道清除技术在囊性纤维化中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 5;5(5):CD002011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002011.pub3.
2
Oscillating devices for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis.用于囊性纤维化患者气道清理的振荡装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 30;4(4):CD006842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006842.pub5.
3
Oscillating devices for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis.用于囊性纤维化患者气道清理的振荡装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD006842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006842.pub4.
4
Physiotherapy for cystic fibrosis in Australia and New Zealand: A clinical practice guideline.澳大利亚和新西兰囊性纤维化的物理治疗:临床实践指南。
Respirology. 2016 May;21(4):656-67. doi: 10.1111/resp.12764. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
5
Chest physiotherapy compared to no chest physiotherapy for cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者胸部物理治疗与不进行胸部物理治疗的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 21;2015(12):CD001401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001401.pub3.
6
Conventional chest physiotherapy compared to other airway clearance techniques for cystic fibrosis.与其他气道清除技术相比,传统胸部物理治疗用于囊性纤维化的情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD002011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002011.pub2.